glm38 wrote:I just don't agree that Bama is the better team. I think WSU is just as talented overall. They just seemed to lose their way offensively in that 2nd half. I really don't think it was Bama's defense. Just poor decisions and some bad shots. And I agree with MVC John - Stutz is the key. If he had played as he's capable of playing WSU would have won.
Well, maybe the Shocks are the better team, but...We sucked at breaking the press. If that's our press break, Bama is better. Our paint offense was non-existent. If that's our interior offense, Bama is better. Bama blocked 14 shots, forced 19 turn overs and we only had 9 assists. We shot 34% from the field. Either Bama has a really good defense or our offense sucks. Bottom line is that Bama played a better game and made the Shockers look overmatched. I believe we are better than that game showed, but we were not the better team last night...which is all that really matters.