by Aargh » December 5th, 2012, 1:47 am
I evidently led this thread off the cliff when I responded to Casey's post that all of MSU's sports had hit toilet status.
I suggested that the loss of athletic dominance could be associated with budget considerations in the athletic department. I gave several examples of MSU responding to budget restraints in their hirings to support my hypothesis.
Evidently pointing out facts makes me an evil "WSU is uber-powerful" villain. I still do not consider a coach who wins a conference title and then bolts after 3 years to be a successful hire. At best that's a "we couldn't keep a successful hire" coach.
If pointing out the fact that WSU has a huge basketball budget compared to most schools in the Valley means that WSU is "elitist", then get used to WSU as an elitist school and WSU fans as elitist fans.
WSU can afford BCS-affiliated wages for their coach. Marshall can make a recruiting visit to a kid in Georgia or on the East Coast and still be home in time for supper. He gets enough charter recruiting flights to do that.
Right now, CU and WSU are the elite programs in the Valley. There will be a team or two challenging every year, but WSU and CU are the teams with the resources, tradition, and budget to remain at the top.
Calling WSU or CU fans "elitist" isn't an insult. It's a recognition of what those programs are doing.