wildjays wrote:Here's Part II of my non-conference scheduling series: Scheduling a non D-1 school or a team with a 200+ RPI?
Some data to help fuel the discussion.
http://whiteandbluereview.com/?p=14162
That was a good column and fairly well supported in terms of applying the opinion to the whole of NCAA D1 basketball. But I have to disagree to an extent, at least as it applies to WSU of late.
The Shocks recently had Alcorn St. and a smattering of other similar schools on their schedule. Not all 250+ RPI schools have this trait, but many of them play an awful brand of basketball - usually athletic, but often undisciplined, poorly coached with poor defense. These games are 30+ point blowouts that do nothing to prepare a team for MVC, let alone NCAA tournament competition. However, when you have a non-D1 school in your vacinity (like Emporia St, Fort Hays St., Washburn, Newman) that is well-coached and disciplined, they are likely to be a better opponent.
If Marshall has a game every year where his choices are Alcorn, MD-Eastern Shore or Alabama A&M against Newman or Emporia St, I'll take the latter two every single year.
- Better competition
- Much less payout, presumably
- No RPI hit (it's arguable how much this matters, though)
- Helps out a local school
There are some 250+ RPI teams that will still give you better competition, like UMKC or North Dakota State. They are preferable to the non-D1s.
But on a case-by-case basis I see no problem replacing one game you know is going to be virtually worthless for your team (but expensive to bring them there) with a worthy, must less costly opponent.