BigMacAttack wrote:There goes UNI's annual non-com schedule strengther.
Um... Nope
17/18: Iowa State RPI 144 - 8th out of 10 counted RPI games. Had RPI games against #2, #3, #4, and #64 in the OOC. The two below Iowa State were part of the MTE and their on campus games.
16/17: Iowa RPI 81 - top half but we had almost every single one of our OOC games fall within the same basic RPI range - sans Oklahoma who was the RPI killer.
15:16: Iowa State RPI 23, wasn't even our best RPI game. This was an attorcious RPI OOC season for UNI. Still had 5 other top 100 OOC games. The opening round loss to top 100 RPI game in Hawaii cost us another top 100 game.
14/15: Iowa RPI of 43 - not even close to our top RPI game. Half of our OOC was top 100. Not our fault the B10, ACC, A10 and CAA teams we beat didn't hold up their end.
I can keep going but the pattern is clear. They don't often hurt UNI (though Iowa had a few years), but they are never the top RPI game. Most years they weren't top 4. The same is true for Drake - who has had significantly worse schedules than UNI.
What's also ironic is since the Big 4 was introduced Drake has actually gotten the better RPI games by year...by 10 RPI spots
Drake: 9 21 29 45 62 157 - average of 53
UNI: 7 23 43 81 81 144 - average of 63
I mean, programs that aren't used to having solid OOCs yearly - like Evansville - probably see them as the only booster that someone could have. Compared to SWAC, OVC, and MEAC programs that certainly is true. Some programs in this conference don't understand the ability to schedule more than one, maybe two, top 100 or 150 programs a year outside of buy games. You'll find almost no UNI fans concerned about replacing that RPI.