NIL in the Postseason

Discuss the MVC hoops season here.

NIL in the Postseason

Postby Action10 » March 26th, 2022, 1:10 pm

This is a dumb idea that I had but was wondering what everyone else thought.
With NIL being a factor in college basketball and the Drake playing in the CBI this year (they should have been in the NIT, but that is a rant for later), would the CBI have a needed place in college basketball if they offered NIL money and sponsorships? To me, a sponsorship for the tournaments MOP and "prize money" for players on the winning team would help the tournament be able to attract quality teams. The old CIT (whatever it is called now) can go away, but I would like to see the CBI be a quality event IF IT IS DONE CORRECTLY. If not, it can go away too.
Like I said, just a dumb idea I had. I am interested what everyone else thinks.
Action10
MVC Role Player
MVC Role Player
 
Posts: 158
Joined: March 7th, 2021, 3:28 pm

NIL in the Postseason

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: NIL in the Postseason

Postby tribecalledquest » March 26th, 2022, 9:30 pm

Action10 wrote:This is a dumb idea that I had but was wondering what everyone else thought.
With NIL being a factor in college basketball and the Drake playing in the CBI this year (they should have been in the NIT, but that is a rant for later), would the CBI have a needed place in college basketball if they offered NIL money and sponsorships? To me, a sponsorship for the tournaments MOP and "prize money" for players on the winning team would help the tournament be able to attract quality teams. The old CIT (whatever it is called now) can go away, but I would like to see the CBI be a quality event IF IT IS DONE CORRECTLY. If not, it can go away too.
Like I said, just a dumb idea I had. I am interested what everyone else thinks.


I don't see why fans dislike events like the CBI so much. What harm do they cause?
tribecalledquest
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 2524
Joined: August 4th, 2010, 10:57 am

Re: NIL in the Postseason

Postby MissouriValleyUnite » March 26th, 2022, 10:27 pm

tribecalledquest wrote:
Action10 wrote:This is a dumb idea that I had but was wondering what everyone else thought.
With NIL being a factor in college basketball and the Drake playing in the CBI this year (they should have been in the NIT, but that is a rant for later), would the CBI have a needed place in college basketball if they offered NIL money and sponsorships? To me, a sponsorship for the tournaments MOP and "prize money" for players on the winning team would help the tournament be able to attract quality teams. The old CIT (whatever it is called now) can go away, but I would like to see the CBI be a quality event IF IT IS DONE CORRECTLY. If not, it can go away too.
Like I said, just a dumb idea I had. I am interested what everyone else thinks.


I don't see why fans dislike events like the CBI so much. What harm do they cause?


It’s a consistency/apples-to-apples comparisons of record-keeping for me. I think each team’s record should be final once they’re eliminated from their conference tournament, and only extended with a bid in the NCAA Tournament or NIT.

I think the NIT should expand to 64 teams and EIEIO tournaments abolished.
User avatar
MissouriValleyUnite
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 1947
Joined: February 10th, 2014, 9:59 am

Re: NIL in the Postseason

Postby tribecalledquest » March 27th, 2022, 10:06 am

MissouriValleyUnite wrote:
tribecalledquest wrote:
Action10 wrote:This is a dumb idea that I had but was wondering what everyone else thought.
With NIL being a factor in college basketball and the Drake playing in the CBI this year (they should have been in the NIT, but that is a rant for later), would the CBI have a needed place in college basketball if they offered NIL money and sponsorships? To me, a sponsorship for the tournaments MOP and "prize money" for players on the winning team would help the tournament be able to attract quality teams. The old CIT (whatever it is called now) can go away, but I would like to see the CBI be a quality event IF IT IS DONE CORRECTLY. If not, it can go away too.
Like I said, just a dumb idea I had. I am interested what everyone else thinks.


I don't see why fans dislike events like the CBI so much. What harm do they cause?


It’s a consistency/apples-to-apples comparisons of record-keeping for me. I think each team’s record should be final once they’re eliminated from their conference tournament, and only extended with a bid in the NCAA Tournament or NIT.

I think the NIT should expand to 64 teams and EIEIO tournaments abolished.


The NCAA doesn't have that power to eliminate them - nor should they.
tribecalledquest
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 2524
Joined: August 4th, 2010, 10:57 am

Re: NIL in the Postseason

Postby Purple35 » June 16th, 2022, 10:10 am

CBI might survive on this level if they can get Casey's General Store or Purina to cough up some change. The problem with post-season is that the NCAA and the networks have driven these things back on the ESPN board to "other" links and you can't find anything. The local media doesn't care by this point and the shiny object is whether some No. 1 seed might have to go overtime against Mountain Home University, making its first ever tournament.

The CBI is for programs that want to see their kids get a couple more games, even if they don't do anything for recruiting or for the budget. It costs money to play these things and often the fieldhouses they want aren't available. Even the NIT has this problem.

Once you get past the designate 40 teams the NCAA sees as worthy, it's a matter of one mid-major playing another at the venue that is the least offensive.

But if you want to reward players who are in the tournament, then that comes down to whether their athletics departments want to participate. If they say no, they are screwing the kid -- who might hold a grudge.
Purple35
MVC Bench Warmer
MVC Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 54
Joined: November 1st, 2018, 5:07 pm

Re: NIL in the Postseason

Postby tribecalledquest » June 16th, 2022, 9:56 pm

Purple35 wrote:CBI might survive on this level if they can get Casey's General Store or Purina to cough up some change. The problem with post-season is that the NCAA and the networks have driven these things back on the ESPN board to "other" links and you can't find anything. The local media doesn't care by this point and the shiny object is whether some No. 1 seed might have to go overtime against Mountain Home University, making its first ever tournament.

The CBI is for programs that want to see their kids get a couple more games, even if they don't do anything for recruiting or for the budget. It costs money to play these things and often the fieldhouses they want aren't available. Even the NIT has this problem.

Once you get past the designate 40 teams the NCAA sees as worthy, it's a matter of one mid-major playing another at the venue that is the least offensive.

But if you want to reward players who are in the tournament, then that comes down to whether their athletics departments want to participate. If they say no, they are screwing the kid -- who might hold a grudge.


The CBI expanded this past season and had the event in a nice little arena in Daytona Beach. It’s a fine event.
tribecalledquest
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 2524
Joined: August 4th, 2010, 10:57 am


Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BCPanther, Majik45 and 176 guests