Birdfan2018 wrote:Red wrote:I hadn't paid much attention to Creighton, Wichita State, or Loyola until I saw the CU-Arkansas game last night. Creighton looks really good. They're a top 10 team so they should be good, but scoring 90 on the Hogs is pretty impressive.
On the other hand, Wichita State lost to San Francisco last night in KC. That isn't a terrible loss, but apparently they lost a home buy game to Alcorn State too? I said it back when the left for greener pastures that the AAC would not be a net gain over the long term and I have to think there are people on that campus who regret it. And this is before UCF, Cincy, and Houston have even left the league and the AAC turns into CUSA.
Loyola has lost three straight and hasn't been terribly competitive against Tulsa, Boise St, and Texas A&M. I have no hard feelings for the Ramblers and wish them well, but it's been a rough start for them.
Harvard 61
Loyola 55
Seeing as I have to suffer through a potentially Lame Duck season with Coach’s contract ending after this year this makes me extremely happy.
Also wish Dana could have gotten the win over Izzo just now.
EDIT: This is a good opportunity to explain to our new conference friends and Valpo how the Valley Runs Deep…
Dana Altman was good at winning Arch Madness, like real good. He was in charge of Creighton when they were in the Valley. I generally root for Oregon because of him, nice guy and good coach. Can only speak for me personally but I dislike McDermott’s Creighton and strongly dislike Loyola. Hate is a term reserved for Loyola depending on the day (specifically Porter Moser’s Loyola partly because he used to coach ISUr), Greggggg Marshall (Old Wichita coach), Wichita, Tulsa, ISU, and USC (non-Valley related, football because I’m a lifelong Irish fan). Welcome! Also my Dad has a beef with DePaul. Not sure what that’s about.