Standings after 7 games

by **Aces1982** » January 16th, 2011, 9:48 pm

MSU.......7-0
WSU.......6-1
ISU-B......6-1
CU.........4-3
UNI........4-3
UE.........3-4
SIU........3-4
DU.........2-5
ISU-R......0-7
BU.........0-7

ISU-R @ DU
UE @ SIU
MSU @ ISU-B
UNI @ WSU
BU @ CU

Most surprising team: ISU-B(an easy choice)
Most disappointing: ISU-R(not that they were going to compete for top spot but most people had them in top 5 if not 6 but 0-7??????)

**Sponsor**

by **MSUDuo** » January 16th, 2011, 10:54 pm

Aces1982 wrote:MSU.......7-0
WSU.......6-1
ISU-B......6-1
CU.........4-3
UNI........4-3
UE.........3-4
SIU........3-4
DU.........2-5
ISU-R......0-7
BU.........0-7

ISU-R @ DU
UE @ SIU
MSU @ ISU-B
UNI @ WSU
BU @ CU

Most surprising team: ISU-B(an easy choice)
Most disappointing: ISU-R(not that they were going to compete for top spot but most people had them in top 5 if not 6 but 0-7??????)

While they were picked to finish 2nd, MSU at 7-0 gives ISUb a run for the money are most surprising at this point in time. I highly doubt anyone had them tabbed for anything better than 4-3 at this point...Seeing who ISUb has played, 6-1 isn't all that surprising...11 games remain

by **BirdmanBB** » January 17th, 2011, 9:07 am

MSUDuo wrote:
Aces1982 wrote:MSU.......7-0
WSU.......6-1
ISU-B......6-1
CU.........4-3
UNI........4-3
UE.........3-4
SIU........3-4
DU.........2-5
ISU-R......0-7
BU.........0-7

ISU-R @ DU
UE @ SIU
MSU @ ISU-B
UNI @ WSU
BU @ CU

Most surprising team: ISU-B(an easy choice)
Most disappointing: ISU-R(not that they were going to compete for top spot but most people had them in top 5 if not 6 but 0-7??????)

While they were picked to finish 2nd, MSU at 7-0 gives ISUb a run for the money are most surprising at this point in time. I highly doubt anyone had them tabbed for anything better than 4-3 at this point...Seeing who ISUb has played, 6-1 isn't all that surprising...11 games remain

I could see a missouri st. fan saying that.....no it's definitely not surprising, especially after everyone elses horrible non-con play. I'm glad it's working out like this though. Both Missouri st. and WSU have a real shot at both getting in. They just need to get Indiana st. off their backs.

by **jlandrus11** » January 17th, 2011, 9:23 am

Trust me, Indiana State is not going away anytime soon. It wouldn't surprise me to see us upset MSU on Wednesday. We are a team to reckon with and the sooner you realize that, the better you will be.

by **MSUDuo** » January 17th, 2011, 10:02 am

jlandrus11 wrote:Trust me, Indiana State is not going away anytime soon. It wouldn't surprise me to see us upset MSU on Wednesday. We are a team to reckon with and the sooner you realize that, the better you will be.

Let's calm down for a second. You will get your chance over 18 games to prove you belong. You've yet to play anyone on the road from the top half of the conference.

It wouldn't surprise me to lose in Terre Haute on Wednesday but I would be disappointed after coming out of Wichita, Omaha, and Cedar Falls with wins.

by **DUShock** » January 17th, 2011, 10:43 am

Pass the popcorn...

by **valleychamp** » January 17th, 2011, 10:52 am

DUShock wrote:Pass the popcorn...

...or crackpipe...

by **MSUDuo** » January 17th, 2011, 11:04 am

DUShock wrote:Pass the popcorn...

by **RoyalShock** » January 17th, 2011, 11:45 am

I'm sure a Sycamore fan could provide better analysis, but with Lathan and Kelly are returning it could upset whatever chemistry they've had going. It just seemed odd that ISU appeared to play better after Lathan and Kelly going out.

So I have to wonder if their return will be a net negative.

by **WSUbballer** » January 17th, 2011, 12:36 pm

Get back to me when the Sycamores win a road game of significance.

Let's remember they have dropped games to Ball State and Eastern Kentucky, got plastered by a very bad Wyoming team by 30, and even dropped a deuce at Evansville.

That 6-1 is very, very deceiving.