WSUbballer wrote:Teetering back on the edge of 1-bid status with these putrid results.
Jet915 wrote:I doubt it, ISUB's at large bid pretty much popped with this loss.
MVCfans wrote:WSUbballer wrote:Teetering back on the edge of 1-bid status with these putrid results.
I'd argue that CU, WSU, and UNI all have legitimate chances.
DoubleJayAlum wrote:MVCfans wrote:WSUbballer wrote:Teetering back on the edge of 1-bid status with these putrid results.
I'd argue that CU, WSU, and UNI all have legitimate chances.
I wouldn't count out InSU yet either.
WSUbballer wrote:Teetering back on the edge of 1-bid status with these putrid results.
I wonder if a Sycamore fan will report in tonight for this one.
isumvc1 wrote:I will chime in on this one. 2 big reasons we lost last night were awful free throw shooting (9-16) and Myles Walker not playing much due to foul trouble, when he was in ISU was doing great, but he barely got to play because he had 2 fouls early in the game, then 2 more within the 1st 2 minutes of the 2nd half.
Had we hit our free throws it would have been a much diff. outcome if you ask me. They also killed us on the boards 33-23, so that didn't help either. 2 offensive rebounds to their 8WSUbballer wrote:Teetering back on the edge of 1-bid status with these putrid results.
I wonder if a Sycamore fan will report in tonight for this one.
2livewu wrote:isumvc1 wrote:I will chime in on this one. 2 big reasons we lost last night were awful free throw shooting (9-16) and Myles Walker not playing much due to foul trouble, when he was in ISU was doing great, but he barely got to play because he had 2 fouls early in the game, then 2 more within the 1st 2 minutes of the 2nd half.
Had we hit our free throws it would have been a much diff. outcome if you ask me. They also killed us on the boards 33-23, so that didn't help either. 2 offensive rebounds to their 8WSUbballer wrote:Teetering back on the edge of 1-bid status with these putrid results.
I wonder if a Sycamore fan will report in tonight for this one.
3rd reason. Boise State is a better team. BSU isn't likely to get an at large unless they finish 1-2 in the MVC and run the table against a weak non con schedule that includes 1 likely NCAA tournament team.
The Trees are very well coached, very disciplined, they play solid D and they do what they do very well. They just don't have "at large" talent or a schedule. I suppose it's possible if they beat Vandy and win the Valley they could get one, but I think we all know that's not going to happen, and if it does, the rest of the Valley isn't as good as we thought. They aren't as good as MSU's team last year, and neither is their schedule, so I doubt it's going to happen.
The Trees will do what they do every year, play for 3 (or 4) days in March.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests