jaysfan24 wrote:call me bias, but we look good.
jaysfan24 wrote:call me bias, but we look good.
jaysfan24 wrote:call me bias, but we look good.
Little Eddie wrote:jaysfan24 wrote:call me bias, but we look good.
You're biased for sure...Tuesday may be a bit of a wake up call. Lots of missed open jumpers by the Drake...not sure MSU will miss like Drake. I don't have as good of a feeling going into Tuesday as most CU fans that's for sure. One things for sure, CU will need to repeat their rebounding performance of yesterday...that was the most impressive thing about yesterday. They didn't give up too many offensive boards...
WuDrWu wrote:Why is Drake such a poor rebounding team? Creighton is not exactly known as a strong rebounding team (they will get better with GMac as their coach) but to get beat by 21 on the boards?
It can't be that poor an effort, I refuse to believe that. Maybe if GE played 20 minutes and had 15 boards I'd more easily understand it, but what's the deal? Are they looking to run at every opportunity and just hope the ball comes to them?
Inquiring minds want to know.
WuDrWu wrote:Why is Drake such a poor rebounding team? Creighton is not exactly known as a strong rebounding team (they will get better with GMac as their coach) but to get beat by 21 on the boards?
It can't be that poor an effort, I refuse to believe that. Maybe if GE played 20 minutes and had 15 boards I'd more easily understand it, but what's the deal? Are they looking to run at every opportunity and just hope the ball comes to them?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests