NIT-ology

by **MSUDuo** » March 13th, 2011, 7:27 pm

What a kick to the gut. My goodness...

You've got Miami and Cleveland State as 2 seeds...What the heck did Miami do this year? WSU or MSU could win 6 games in the ACC...

I really feel bad for Harvard...

The only bright spot is that New Mexico is in our same bracket...

**Sponsor**

by **WSUbballer** » March 13th, 2011, 7:57 pm

Go Valley!

by **PowderBlue** » March 13th, 2011, 8:03 pm

It'd be a tough road, but MSU and WSU could meet up in the NIT championship. That'd be a big middle finger to the selection committees.

by **Unsmooth Moment** » March 13th, 2011, 8:12 pm

PowderBlue wrote:It'd be a tough road, but MSU and WSU could meet up in the NIT championship. That'd be a big middle finger to the selection committees.

does anyone outside of the 32 teams fans pay attention to the NIT? i doubt it.. Winning the NIT doesn't make the selection committee care about their picks...

by **dgreenwell3** » March 13th, 2011, 8:15 pm

I have no idea why in god's name Miami would be a 2 seed...that makes absolutely no sense to me...maybe that's me...

by **PowderBlue** » March 13th, 2011, 8:19 pm

Unsmooth Moment wrote:
PowderBlue wrote:It'd be a tough road, but MSU and WSU could meet up in the NIT championship. That'd be a big middle finger to the selection committees.

does anyone outside of the 32 teams fans pay attention to the NIT? i doubt it.. Winning the NIT doesn't make the selection committee care about their picks...

Sorry...wrong choice of words I guess. I feel like if two MVC teams are in the NIT finals it does help the image of the conference to people who pay attention.

by **MSUDuo** » March 13th, 2011, 9:56 pm

dgreenwell3 wrote:I have no idea why in god's name Miami would be a 2 seed...that makes absolutely no sense to me...maybe that's me...

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

NIT-ology

Re: NIT-ology

Re: NIT-ology

Re: NIT-ology

Re: NIT-ology

Re: NIT-ology

Re: NIT-ology

Re: NIT-ology

Re: NIT-ology

Who is online