I think it would behoove a large portion of us to reference this:
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=422
We have no one to blame but ourselves for responding to his attempts to bait us and his blatant trolling.
PantherSigEp wrote:DoubleJayAlum wrote:PantherSigEp wrote:I would highly doubt that faculty wanting to see funding move from athletics to academics is a UNI-only problem. I would wager every school that funds athletics has some sort of similar issue. The vocal minority of faculty, is just that, a minority. To put much stock into the faculty wanting athletics to cut its budget is just silly.
Sure, every campus has a few classical civilization or bearded philosophy instructors that don't like sports. Big difference between favoring one thing and "looking for blood" though, as your AD said. By the way, Dannen also never said that the comments came from "a vocal minority of the faculty." You made that part up. In fact, Dannen's quote seems to imply that it is much more than a minority of the faculty. If it was just a couple of nutjobs, odds are Dannen wouldn't reference them at all.
Further, at most schools, large numbers of faculty members tend to be season ticket holders for athletics. When the faculty is looking for blood, it doesn't bode well when additional cuts are made.
When UNI knocked off Kansas a few years ago, all we heard was how valuable it was to the university and how everyone around the campus supported the athletic programs. Either that was a bit of hyperbole, or the financial situation has caused the faculty to shift their view on the value of athletic success.
What in the heck are you talking about? How am I making anything up? If you had any sort of contact with UNI Faculty you would see that very few of them have an issue with the recent budget cuts. Those "few classical civilization or bearded philosophy instructors that don't like sports" are exactly who we are talking about and they comprise a small portion of UNI's 2000+ faculty. Dannen references that minority because they had received such notoriety for their vote of "no-confidence" in Pres. Allen and ridiculous protests against the Board of Regents. Seriously DoubleJay, you make this very simple to counter
Kyle wrote:The reason UNI fans are not worried about the financial cuts is because the good news FAR outweighs the bad.
You keep talking about the $500K cut, but what about the MILLIONS of dollars raised from other sources? UNI fans are looking at the whole picture, and like a broken record you keep talking about the same thing.
Let's break down the financial good and bad over the past few years:
The Good:
-The football team is playing two BCS teams this year which will net the athletic department about $1MM
-We raised $6.5MM in 24 hours to pay for a 10 year contract with a built in $25K/year raise for coach Jacobson
-Signed marketing deal with Learfield which DOUBLED our marketing revenue
-Raised $22MM in the 3rd year of a 5 year fundraising effort to endow scholarships (original goal was $15MM--new goal is $30MM)
-Installed suites in the McLeod Center which generates $150,000/year
-Assets in the athletic department have grown from $3MM to $9MM
-Football game day revenue has doubled
-Athletic department received a $2MM unrestricted private donation--the largest single unrestricted gift in school history
The Bad:
-$500,000/year cut from the general fund (3% of the total athletic budget)
-Dropped Baseball (which saved the department $400,000/year)
C0|db|00ded wrote:This is so embarrassing... I visit this forum for the first time in forever and the top thread is about UNI being broke(r).
Message to NIU: You tried the D1 experiment and it failed. It's time to go back to D2 and get your house in order. Of course you could just close down basketball and focus on what you do best - wrastlin'.
T
...
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Chuck A and 50 guests