TBS_20 wrote:I wouldnt be surprised if Missouri jumps to the Sun Belt after this season
Hey now, Auburn looks winnable this Saturday
TBS_20 wrote:I wouldnt be surprised if Missouri jumps to the Sun Belt after this season
BEARZ77 wrote:You seem to have a lot invested in arguing against a school considering moving up. I get many of your arguments, have made some of the same myself over the years. And I'm one of those who thinks FBS and high level FCS will all be together in the [near] future. But I also think you overstate some of the points. All schools besides about 50-60 lose money on sports , including Bradley , so it's really just a matter of how much you lose and what your sense of the benefit is in doing so. Some of that benefit is blue sky, but many see value in that, and some have tangible value like a football booster contributing to other building projects. Missouri State is in , I won't say a unique situation, but one different than many at our level. We have a large enrollment and are the second largest university in the state, and there really is no competitor except MU . We have great facilities and a great campus overall, so no real issues with football robbing us of that; actually it's football that needs more attention that way[ facility wise] . We've always had a well rounded athletics department , made the NCAA's in baseball, softball, soccer, wbb, the FCS playoffs and the mens NIT last year, have dominated swimming and diving for a decade in the valley; the point being, we have healthy programs established, so I'm not overly concerned football will crash everything. It's a risk, but what's wrong with risk.
I think if I was a Bradley fan, I'd be looking at taking some risk or whether sitting safe in a cocoon has been smart given almost all your original constituents in the MVC have found their way to better settings while Bradley stayed pat. Look at Cinn., Memphis, WSU, SLU, Louisville, Tulsa, etc ; all gone and much higher status Even later adds like Loyola and Creighton, in and out of the Valley to better settings. I started following the MVC in the 60's and I think only Drake and Bradley were members then that still are. Nothing wrong with that, but you have to think about why have all those other schools been able to move up and not Bradley. Perhaps the same small mindedness .
Also I think some of you look at bowl games as the payoff in FBS; it's the noncon games . Missouri State got $450,000 I think for the Arkansas game,if we were FBS it would have been more like 1.4 million. Again , who knows what it all will look like in 5 years, I just like our options and the fact we are open to their consideration.
BCPanther wrote:Feels like a good time to point out the most successful public Valley basketball school of the last 20 years is also the most historically successful football school of the Valley publics.
It doesn't have to be an either/or. With the right hires, you can be good at both.
BCPanther wrote:Feels like a good time to point out the most successful public Valley basketball school of the last 20 years is also the most historically successful football school of the Valley publics.
It doesn't have to be an either/or. With the right hires, you can be good at both.
Drakey wrote:BCPanther wrote:Feels like a good time to point out the most successful public Valley basketball school of the last 20 years is also the most historically successful football school of the Valley publics.
It doesn't have to be an either/or. With the right hires, you can be good at both.
The first two schools that come to mind when i think of the most successful Valley teams are Wichita State and Creighton.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 139 guests