Action10 wrote:BCPanther wrote:This league has been around and successful for 110 years outside of a short period in the early-mid 90s.
Guys, I'm as much of a basketball guy as y'all are. I live for Panther Basketball. If we were making a basketball decision, I'm with you. Murray and stop at 11. I don't disagree at all from a basketball standpoint.
The problem is that this isn't a basketball decision. This is the first time we've had to think like a University President rather than an Athletic Director. I'm privy to some of UNIs enrollment projections based on HS classes in Iowa and and Midwest. The coming cliff starting in 2025 is absolutely terrifying and that's as a state school. The private schools have to be positively shitting their pants at this point. That's why it's got to be Arlington and UIC first. 1 or 2 extra out of state students pet class paying out of state or private tuition can and will make a huge difference.
There are 1.5 million people within 2 hours of Cedar Falls and UNI is terrified there aren't enough people. We've got to get into growing areas with large populations.
I agree with almost all of what you post on here BC and I think you are right that the President's are concerned with enrollment. That said, I think the President's are chasing something ridiculous if UT-Arlington is added instead of Murray State simply over a population base. Do people in Texas realize what league UT-Arlington plays in? Is having a basketball game between Bradley and UT-Arlington on Bally's Sports Southwest going to cause a high school kid to go school in Peoria?
Again, I agree with what you say and am positive that you are right about what the President's are thinking. I just think they are wrong.
RacerJoeD wrote:I don’t think it’s easier to get 2 out of 2m than 2 out of 37k. Especially when zero of the 2m are paying attention
NuncEstBibendum wrote:RacerJoeD wrote:I don’t think it’s easier to get 2 out of 2m than 2 out of 37k. Especially when zero of the 2m are paying attention
I got a C in Business Stats but this is some math we can all enjoy.
RacerJoeD wrote:I don’t know about the rest but I’m not trying to argue what they are going to do. I frankly have no clue. I’m just pointing out that if that is their plan, what they stand to lose is the very thing that has made the MVC special. And they will do that while also not fixing the problem they are trying to fix.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests