Red wrote:Is it time to add Wichita St to this poll? Strolled over to their board and there's at least a few names that you would recognize who seem to think rejoining the Valley is not a terrible idea now.
stl scooter wrote:Red wrote:Is it time to add Wichita St to this poll? Strolled over to their board and there's at least a few names that you would recognize who seem to think rejoining the Valley is not a terrible idea now.
Maybe Tulsa too?
Red wrote:stl scooter wrote:Red wrote:Is it time to add Wichita St to this poll? Strolled over to their board and there's at least a few names that you would recognize who seem to think rejoining the Valley is not a terrible idea now.
Maybe Tulsa too?
Won't happen because of football. SLU makes the most sense but won't happen. Similarly, I still think Dayton would be great but they are both delusional about the Big East.
TBS_20 wrote:Someone on Shockernet is saying second best option behind MWC is the Valley if the AAC adds a bunch of crap basketball schools which appears likely. They don't seem to want the A-10. Big East isn't realistic yet. They are also happy with the MVC pickups.
Imagine if we could lure them back in if the AAC cant add anyone good then maybe they could help get Dayton. If we get one of those then that weakens the A-10 and its possible then that SLU comes. The ball keeps rolling and those 3 big adds could maybe lure Creighton back. Maybe Butler or Marquette after that. Now, all that won't happen but I'd be happy just getting Wichita and Dayton. it would eliminate travel expenses because everyone i mentioned is west of dayton and east of Wichita
TBS_20 wrote:Someone on Shockernet is saying second best option behind MWC is the Valley if the AAC adds a bunch of crap basketball schools which appears likely. They don't seem to want the A-10. Big East isn't realistic yet. They are also happy with the MVC pickups.
Imagine if we could lure them back in if the AAC cant add anyone good then maybe they could help get Dayton. If we get one of those then that weakens the A-10 and its possible then that SLU comes. The ball keeps rolling and those 3 big adds could maybe lure Creighton back. Maybe Butler or Marquette after that. Now, all that won't happen but I'd be happy just getting Wichita and Dayton. it would eliminate travel expenses because everyone i mentioned is west of dayton and east of Wichita
hot nuts wrote:TBS_20 wrote:Someone on Shockernet is saying second best option behind MWC is the Valley if the AAC adds a bunch of crap basketball schools which appears likely. They don't seem to want the A-10. Big East isn't realistic yet. They are also happy with the MVC pickups.
Imagine if we could lure them back in if the AAC cant add anyone good then maybe they could help get Dayton. If we get one of those then that weakens the A-10 and its possible then that SLU comes. The ball keeps rolling and those 3 big adds could maybe lure Creighton back. Maybe Butler or Marquette after that. Now, all that won't happen but I'd be happy just getting Wichita and Dayton. it would eliminate travel expenses because everyone i mentioned is west of dayton and east of Wichita
No idea if this is realistic but I like this line of thought.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 47 guests