shocktheheart wrote:From the NCAA rule book:
Section 26. Fighting
Art. 7. When during the course of play (live ball), an individual strikes an
opponent with the hand, elbow, arm, foot, knee or leg in a nonconfrontational
manner but the act is excessive or severe, it shall be ruled as a flagrant 2 personal
foul and not a fighting action. When a defined body part is used to strike an
opponent but the contact is not severe or excessive, a judgment shall be made by
the official as to whether the contact is a flagrant 1 personal foul.
The refs were within their power to call a flagrant 1 foul. With what ESPN put on the screen (definition of flagrant fouls) I didn't think it could be a flagrant foul, but with this definition I believed they made the correct call.
Just heard from a former official and current supervisor/evaluator of officials. He believes that if the officials would have stopped play at the time of the infraction that a Flagrant 2 probably would have been called, but the fact that they waited until Marshall asked for review resulted in the infraction being toned down to Flagrant 1. He thought they handled it pretty well and that common sense prevailed. ISU fans might consider themselves fortunate that Carmichael won't be suspended for the next game.