FeartheQ wrote:Good stuff sub
Like I said, more than RPI plays into it but it gives us an idea of where they stand. I also mentioned markets and following as well as potential. You just said it in a much more long windede wayCoogles wrote:RPI is interesting to look at, but honestly it's pretty irrelevant when it comes to looking at what programs should or shouldn't be considered for league expansion. A team is one good coach and few decent recruiting classes from having a stellar RPI, but it could still be a very medicore program. Case-in-point being Milwaukee. Bruce Pearl was able to recruit there and play a style that won him quite a few games. That doesn't make Milwaukee an appealing program.
Fun fact: Indiana's RPI over the last 8 seasons has averaged 110. Does that mean they're not a top half program in the Valley? Of course they are. They would easily be the best program in the league, regardless of how bad these past 3 seasons have been.
Sooooo much more goes into evaluating a university's athletic department than just RPI. How devoted is the fanbase? Do they have a strong base of donors? Do they capture media attention in their own market? Do they have a following across the state? Nationally? How well attended are their athletic events? Athletic budget size? Can it be grown if necessary? What kind of facilities do they have or do they have planned? Academics play a role too.
Take St. Louis, for example. They're being put down around here by some as not that great of a program, but that's a university the MVC should bend over backwards to get, if possible. Strong endowment compared to the other private schools. Excellent academics. Would be the 2nd or 3rd largest MBB budget in the conference. Larger overall athletic budget than all of the other privates in the Valley. Excellent facilities. Strong recruiting base in St. Louis/Kansas City. Maybe Majerus doesn't get it done, but there's no question a good coach could win there. Elign would be downright moronic if he got a call saying the Bills wanted to join the MVC and he said no.
SubGod22 wrote:
Have I missed anyone? How many of the teams at the top of this list would actually consider a move? Would the ones that would be worth it? Do any of these teams at least have the potential to help given a new conference? Would any media markets in this group help enough that it would be worth taking certain teams? Obviously, we'd all love to have Butler, Dayton and Xavier. But some strange things would have to go down for that to happen. Odds are they stay east. If any other teams come up, I'll try and add them to the list.
I went and added Boise since they were also rumored to be looking with AFA.
havoc wrote:SubGod22 wrote:
Have I missed anyone? How many of the teams at the top of this list would actually consider a move? Would the ones that would be worth it? Do any of these teams at least have the potential to help given a new conference? Would any media markets in this group help enough that it would be worth taking certain teams? Obviously, we'd all love to have Butler, Dayton and Xavier. But some strange things would have to go down for that to happen. Odds are they stay east. If any other teams come up, I'll try and add them to the list.
I went and added Boise since they were also rumored to be looking with AFA.
Western Kentucky might be worth looking in to. They have a pretty strong following are typically put solid teams on the floor. One big problem would be a place for them to park their football team.
unipanther99 wrote:I keep thinking the University of Denver has potential. They aren't there yet obviously. Wiki says they have an endowment of $300 million.
Must be doing something right.
Also, does anyone know what kind of interest UALR generates in Little Rock? Decent sized media market, not too far outside the footprint and they were in the tournament last year.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests