Campbellproud wrote:VUGrad1314 wrote:Take it from us as Valpo fans: We played in a league with presence in multiple top 115 markets (Chicago Milwaukee Green Bay Detroit Cleveland Dayton Cincinnati Youngstown) and gave all of that up to join with schools in Peoria Carbondale Des Moines Cedar Falls Springfield Evansville Terre Haute and Bloomington\Normal. I can assure you that we did not do this to get into markets. We did it because we were tired of playing in empty gyms with schools with largely apathetic fanbases and wanted the challenge of better athletic brands. The move to the MVC was all about athletics for Valpo. I don't want to see the MVC make the same mistake of the Horizon League and add total afterthoughts in big markets with apathetic fanbases that could drag down the league. If KC and Arlington don't hit (which is a distinct possibility especially with KC) we run the risk of becoming a 14 team one bid league which is really not ideal. We need to consider Golden's premise that we can get into bigger markets while still serving our goals of being a multibid league. If Arlington shows impressive commitment I can come around on them but we need NKU its program success and attendance (near 4000). It's the best balance of basketball success and market size available to us. Wright State is too if they get their financial house in order and I am very intrigued by Bellarmine and St Thomas (I'm pretty sure those metros are growing too especially Louisville but I'm not positive). I would take UIC absolutely at this point because of the value of Chicago and they absolutely ooze potential (much like Arlington I will concede) but I find Chicago to be a more important market than Dallas if it's an either or choice. I really don't want to see us go after too many market adds with little proven ability in basketball. I don't think that's the way forward for this league.
No offense, but Valpo isn’t living up to their end of the bargain and is a drag on the league. We can’t risk that again if we have no way of kicking teams out. We are better off staying pat right now and working on improving what we have than adding anymore anchors.
You're absolutely right on Valpo and as I have said before that's all the more reason why any add we make can't be a speculative market add primarily directed at enrollment and needs to be a proven basketball add which is why Murray State and to a lesser extent Northern Kentucky need to be the priorities. I still believe that our enrollment adds should be closer to the footprint. I might be able to stomach Arlington if we see a strong commitment (which we absolutely also need to see from Valpo as well) but as you said (and I totally agree) we can't add anchors.