Aargh wrote:Phelps > Jank
2-4 in favor of Jank
I seriously think switching from Moser to Jank was a downgrade.
Moser: 22-50
Jank: 39-33
jaybydna wrote:Honest question: Are you ready to play valley ball? Do you really think you are ready to play the upper half of the valley after playing the 326th best schedule? Take one of your signature wins, and compare the starting lineup against WSU, Creighton, and UNI? Compare team intangibles as well. Do they have a deep bench or did they play 7 guys? Do they run and gun or play defense or both? Were they on the road for 3 weeks straight when you played them?
If you are prepared, great. I would be shocked, but great. If you are not prepared, you should be calling for Jank's head.
45otseoj wrote:Aargh wrote:Phelps > Jank
2-4 in favor of JankI seriously think switching from Moser to Jank was a downgrade.
Moser: 22-50
Jank: 39-33
hot nuts wrote:jaybydna wrote:Honest question: Are you ready to play valley ball? Do you really think you are ready to play the upper half of the valley after playing the 326th best schedule? Take one of your signature wins, and compare the starting lineup against WSU, Creighton, and UNI? Compare team intangibles as well. Do they have a deep bench or did they play 7 guys? Do they run and gun or play defense or both? Were they on the road for 3 weeks straight when you played them?
If you are prepared, great. I would be shocked, but great. If you are not prepared, you should be calling for Jank's head.
Yeah! Screw you idiot Redbird fans for being optimistic and thinking you won't just be a pile of puke again! Just stop logging on here and expressing your optimism. I don't even know why you waste $5 to goto games when you are irrelevant.
TylerDurden wrote:45otseoj wrote:Aargh wrote:Phelps > Jank
2-4 in favor of JankI seriously think switching from Moser to Jank was a downgrade.
Moser: 22-50
Jank: 39-33
Let's be fair here about the two records. These guys came into two totally different situations.
Moser inherited an 8-21 team that finished in 8th place, improved the overall record two straight years, stepped back one year then Osiris came in and had them right back in the mix.
The MVC record wasn't good, but he had last place talent and had to try to sell that against a strong MVC field that was earning multiple bids every year.
Jank inherited the best player in the league (arguably) and road him for three years against a comparatively week MVC - one bid every year he's been there. Jank's players, so far, haven't been nearly as good as Moser's.
That said, I can see ISUR staying out of Thursday.
CU, WSU, UNI, ISUB and MSU seem like the top five at this point, but UE, DU, BU, SIU and ISUR are what's left.
I like the fight in UE (at times) and BU (most times) and DU is an odd team, but I think ISUR has more depth than any of those teams. It would be great theater to see ISUR and BU battling to stay out of Thursday on the last day of the season.
45otseoj wrote:Aargh wrote:Phelps > Jank
2-4 in favor of JankI seriously think switching from Moser to Jank was a downgrade.
Moser: 22-50
Jank: 39-33
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests