ahunte1 wrote:Am I looking at the wrong stats? ESPN.com says: 18.4PPG (30% from three, 90% FT, doesn't give 2P% but I'll grant you that one); 2.8 REB; 1.6 APG; 3.2 TO.
I'm have no doubt that he can be a great player in the Valley, but you're talking about Steph Curry numbers.
He was at 19.4 point ts yesterday before the game. His average fell a point because he only managed 15 points in 19 minutes and missed 2 wide open 3s that he hits way more than he misses.
It's not hard to believe he stays at the 19-20, or more range as he settles into the college game. He's there now and he's not shooting well.
His 3% will go up. He won't drop from 48% in high school to 30% on college and stay there. If that means just 1 more 3 per game he is at 21 ppg and 3 of 7 per game, or 43%. He's actually shooting 59% from 2 right now. I took his overall percent as his 2 point. He shot 60% in HS from 2. So 50-55 seems like a safe guess for college right now
2 more assists per game can easily show up as the team figures this system out and gets comfortable.
Again, other than the 3 point percentage and assists I'm already just using his numbers from his first 4 games.
I get it. He's a pasty white kid with white blonde hair and braces still on his teeth from Iowa that's playing at UNI. No one wants to think he can actually be really good. I get that That's fine. He is still the highest rated MVC recruit in a long damn time. He did more or less dominate the AAU circuit for 3 years. But he doesn't look like a dominant MVC player and he's at uni, a place that doesn't have a single player show like that. So it's not believable he can do it