acesfool wrote:The Aces will most likely lose both games to WSU, MSU, UNI, and Creighton. That means the Aces would have to go either 8-2 or 9-1 against the rest of the league to achieve an 8-10 or 9-9 MVC record. My bet is the Aces win 5 at the most and it will probably be less.
WSUbballer wrote:Beating a play-in team at home is hardly what I would call "impressive". Yeah, it's a win, but it getting some people to talk about the possibility of 8-10 or 9-9 is a bit ludicrous.
WSUbballer wrote:Beating a play-in team at home is hardly what I would call "impressive". Yeah, it's a win, but it getting some people to talk about the possibility of 8-10 or 9-9 is a bit ludicrous.
WuDrWu wrote:Ok I am really not trying to be mean here, but why "should" you have won that game?
I watched the game, twice....Indiana State is a better team. They are more talented at almost every position.
I will concede that Evansville has the better coach. But Evansville should have won? Indiana State was up 18 at one point...do you EVER think UE is going to be ahead of ISU by 18? The Trees self imploded, allowing for the Aces comeback. Evansville shouldn't have been in that game.
At best, imho, UE wins 3 or 4 out of 10 HOME games against ISUB, at BEST. Some Aces fans have to stop using the Butler result as a baseline for expectations.
WuDrWu wrote:Ok I am really not trying to be mean here, but why "should" you have won that game?
I watched the game, twice....Indiana State is a better team. They are more talented at almost every position.
I will concede that Evansville has the better coach. But Evansville should have won? Indiana State was up 18 at one point...do you EVER think UE is going to be ahead of ISU by 18? The Trees self imploded, allowing for the Aces comeback. Evansville shouldn't have been in that game.
At best, imho, UE wins 3 or 4 out of 10 HOME games against ISUB, at BEST. Some Aces fans have to stop using the Butler result as a baseline for expectations.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 148 guests