I know woulda coulda shoulda and almost doesn't count but to be fair Murray State has come within an eyelash of several Tournament wins including what would have been two Sweet 16 appearances. Here's a brief rundown:
1988 2nd round Lost to Kansas by 3 61-58
1990 they nearly UMBC'd Michigan State losing by four in OT 75-71
1997 Lost to Duke by 3 71-68
2006 Lost to North Carolina by four 69-65 (Not bad for a bunch of guys who actually have to go to class when they aren't at practice)
2010 2nd round Lost to Butler by 2 54-52
Give Murray State just a few more bounces their way and they could be looking at at minimum a 9-12 all time tournament record which would have them tied with Loyola for second among current Valley members. Their total (4) is ahead of Missouri State ISUr Evansville and Valpo and just one behind ISUb Drake and UNI and just two behind SIU. if you ask me their all time resume stacks up just fine against any MVC member. And this is coming from somebody who likes the idea of adding the Dakotas, but Murray State brings a good traveling fanbase (would the Dakota fans really travel all the way to STL for a tournament? I Think that's a big reason why they haven't been added yet to be honest.) and is within our footprint so they present much fewer travel concerns than the Dakotas especially in wintertime. I'd rather see us build as strong a league as we can without the Dakotas and then bring them in as a sort of final move to solidify the conference once and for all. But we shouldn't get too far ahead of ourselves. It's been hard enough to convince the MVC to just add Murray State, let alone schools several hours outside the footprint.