VUGrad1314 wrote:Also I read in this thread (or a different similar thread) why we are concerned that UIC and UTA might tank the league. It's because some schools would be trading the chance to play upper tier MVC teams (Drake Bradley MSU UNI presumably Belmont etc) for schools that will probably struggle thereby driving down the overall metrics of the league. If we're going to expand and abandon the double round robin that has been so core to the intimacy and solid rivalries of this league then we need a better reason than a hope and prayer that the school(s) we add MIGHT be good. I've heard past performance is no guarantee of future results and that is true but I'd trust a school with a track record over a hope that a school will become consistently good any day. Banking on potential is risky. Just because it worked out with Loyola doesn't mean UIC and\or UTA will work out. This league needs quality right now with the defection of Loyola not maybes. Go with the school with the track record. Go with Murray State and only Murray State.
It's the opposite. By getting rid of the round robin you can shield your better teams from having to play the bottom teams more than once.
Teams get bids, not leagues.
Welcome back! You've been missed!