Should the Missouri Valley expand?

Discuss the MVC hoops season here.

Re: Should the Missouri Valley expand?

Postby Coogles » October 10th, 2011, 2:08 pm

RoyalShock wrote:The numbers I got were from the Dept. of Ed and must have been at least a few years old since Fall 2011 show 11,700 undergrads (8361 full-time, 3368 part-time). Given that, I'd be even more confident they would have an "average" MVC profile within a few years of competition. That may not improve the "power" of the MVC, but it would add a little more stability, IMO. And it expands the MVC further east, which is usually a good thing, both for TV/revenue and recruiting.

It could also lay the groundwork to lure Butler (I just don't see a jump from Horizon to Big East).


Disclaimer: Butler fan here.

I honestly don't think there is a single school in the Horizon worth considereing for the MVC outside of Butler.

Cleveland St. - Honestly, one of the last options if pulling from the HL is the way you're trying to go. Fewer than 1,000 of CSU's 16k+ students live on campus. Epitome of an urban commuter school with no fanbase. Average 3k or less for MBB even when they're good. Decent basketball teams occasionally, but it doesn't have the bones of a good program.

Detroit - Tired university in a dead shell of a city. It has trouble recruiting student athletes based on location alone and doesn't pull fans from the city at all. Averaged <2,500 fans last year for MBB.

Green Bay - The most cash-strapped athetic department in the conference. Satellite campus with no unique identity or fan following. Averaged 3,007 last year for MBB.

Loyola - This is one in the league actually showing some promise. Brand new student athlete facilities, new AD, new MBB coach who should be familiar to Valley fans (Porter Moser), and a completely renovated Gentile Center. It's small (will seat ~4,800) and they still can't fill it (averaged 2,428 last year), but academically it's a good school and gives the Chicago alums of your other Illinois schools a chance to see their team on the road without leaving home.

Milwaukee - This is probably the best top-to-bottom athletic department in the conference outside of Butler. Consistently near or at the top for the all-sports trophy. MBB with some decent recent success. Main problem is they suffer the same lack of an identity with Green Bay in being a satellite campus and will always play second fiddle to Marquette in their home town. Big school (>30k), but it's an urban commuter campus with maybe 2k actually living in student housing. You'll probably see more Badger apparel when walking around campus than you will Milwaukee Panther gear. Attendance was 4,154 last year, but that was greatly inflated by the conference tournament games. It will typically be ~3k and was 2,883 the year prior.

UIC - Same as the two Wisconsin schools. Satellite urban school, commuter campus, no fanbase, no hope of ever being even a consistently average program. Attendance was 3,099 last year, but only because they give away tickets like they're Jolley Ranchers on Halloween.

Valpo - Evansville, but worse. Terrible facilities to boot. Attendance was 3,362 last year in their best year yet in the Horizon.

Wright State - If you want to pull a program from the Horizon, this is probably the one. It has a nice on-campus arena, solid athletic facilities, and is actually a more traditional campus with the vast majority of its student living in student housing or very close nearby. Attendance was 2nd in the conference at 4,792. Biggest problem is that it will always live in the shadow of Dayton.

Youngstown - They're a low-major athletic dept. propping up a MVFC team. Their other sports are pathetic across the board. Most of the HL membership would LOVE to see them gone.
Coogles
MVC Recruit
MVC Recruit
 
Posts: 18
Joined: February 8th, 2011, 6:49 pm

Re: Should the Missouri Valley expand?

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: Should the Missouri Valley expand?

Postby FeartheQ » October 10th, 2011, 2:58 pm

If only Butler didn't have it made in the Horizon, they would probably want to be affiliated with a better conference. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Butler and SLU would be on my short list, both are probably unattainable for the Valley at this juncture though.
User avatar
FeartheQ
MVC starter
MVC starter
 
Posts: 326
Joined: August 5th, 2010, 12:15 pm

Re: Should the Missouri Valley expand?

Postby Aargh » October 10th, 2011, 5:11 pm

From that rundown of the HL, it seems that Butler would be a much better fit in the Valley than in the HL.

I'm opposed to AFA, but if AFA and Butler both joined, then I think the Valley could renegotiate the TV deal and revenue to each school would increase. Butler's revenue would probably be a huge increase from what they get from the HL.
User avatar
Aargh
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 1924
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 10:08 pm

Re: Should the Missouri Valley expand?

Postby gtmoBlue » October 10th, 2011, 5:23 pm

The travel complications makes the case for a 2 team expansion only...

Add SLU and either WKU, DePaul, or Butler.
SLU in the West Div, the other new uni in the East Div.

Adding Air Force makes no sense in any way, shape, or form.
When in doubt...Be Bold!
User avatar
gtmoBlue
MVC Bench Warmer
MVC Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 28
Joined: August 9th, 2010, 10:52 am

Re: Should the Missouri Valley expand?

Postby rally » October 10th, 2011, 5:27 pm

Aargh wrote:From that rundown of the HL, it seems that Butler would be a much better fit in the Valley than in the HL.

I'm opposed to AFA, but if AFA and Butler both joined, then I think the Valley could renegotiate the TV deal and revenue to each school would increase. Butler's revenue would probably be a huge increase from what they get from the HL.


The amount of money schools outside the BCS conferences make from TV revenues is so minuscule that it really wouldn't even enter the equation for a team like Butler. They would also be taking a huge hit from losing out on their shares from NCAA tourney revenues they have earned the past two seasons.
rally
MVC Role Player
MVC Role Player
 
Posts: 86
Joined: September 1st, 2010, 8:48 am

Re: Should the Missouri Valley expand?

Postby rally » October 10th, 2011, 5:45 pm

MVCfans wrote:
DoubleJayAlum wrote:If Cleveland St is the best we can do, we shouldn't do anything.


My thought on adding Cleveland State was it might be helpful in attracting Butler although I've seen some reports that Butler might be considered for a spot in a new Big East. I wouldn't consider adding Cleveland State without Butler, if that makes sense. Plus, if Dayton started looking should Xavier and Temple leave the A10, maybe having another school in Ohio becomes beneficial in adding the Flyers.


Clevleand State isn't going to attract anyone of significance, especially not Butler or Dayton. Also, if Xavier leaves the A10, it's going to be because the Big East basketball teams split off and Butler/Dayton would be likely candidates to join them in that case.

Realistically, I don't think the Valley is in much of a position to anything significantly in terms of expansion in near future.
rally
MVC Role Player
MVC Role Player
 
Posts: 86
Joined: September 1st, 2010, 8:48 am

Re: Should the Missouri Valley expand?

Postby BirdmanBB » October 11th, 2011, 9:11 am

rally wrote:
Aargh wrote:From that rundown of the HL, it seems that Butler would be a much better fit in the Valley than in the HL.

I'm opposed to AFA, but if AFA and Butler both joined, then I think the Valley could renegotiate the TV deal and revenue to each school would increase. Butler's revenue would probably be a huge increase from what they get from the HL.


The amount of money schools outside the BCS conferences make from TV revenues is so minuscule that it really wouldn't even enter the equation for a team like Butler. They would also be taking a huge hit from losing out on their shares from NCAA tourney revenues they have earned the past two seasons.


Our conference might be more attractive to schools like Butler if we had sustained multiple bid success. It would offer them much more money than what they currently recieve in the horizon. Speaking of which, is the horizon a revenue sharing league? If they are doing all the work and sharing the cash then that might be incentive for them to move to a conference that sends multiple teams. Unfortunately we are behind in that category.
BirdmanBB
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 1037
Joined: August 5th, 2010, 10:06 am

Re: Should the Missouri Valley expand?

Postby ihsi » October 11th, 2011, 9:26 am

BirdmanBB wrote:Our conference might be more attractive to schools like Butler if we had sustained multiple bid success. It would offer them much more money than what they currently recieve in the horizon. Speaking of which, is the horizon a revenue sharing league? If they are doing all the work and sharing the cash then that might be incentive for them to move to a conference that sends multiple teams. Unfortunately we are behind in that category.


Great point. I think most people see that our trend line is looking up and Butler is doing all of the heavy lifting in the Horizon, propping up the other schools financially. If we don't at least approach them we are doing ourselves a disservice. I hope we are proactive and try to make a splash.
User avatar
ihsi
MVC starter
MVC starter
 
Posts: 242
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:19 am

Re: Should the Missouri Valley expand?

Postby Aces1982 » October 11th, 2011, 9:46 am

Why would Butler even think about moving? Butler makes the NCAA on a regular basis, switching to the MVC would hinder that. The MVC does nothing for Butler. Butler does not need the MVC nearly as much as the MVC needs Butler.
Aces1982
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 834
Joined: August 12th, 2010, 2:31 pm

Re: Should the Missouri Valley expand?

Postby BirdmanBB » October 11th, 2011, 9:47 am

ihsi wrote:
BirdmanBB wrote:Our conference might be more attractive to schools like Butler if we had sustained multiple bid success. It would offer them much more money than what they currently recieve in the horizon. Speaking of which, is the horizon a revenue sharing league? If they are doing all the work and sharing the cash then that might be incentive for them to move to a conference that sends multiple teams. Unfortunately we are behind in that category.


Great point. I think most people see that our trend line is looking up and Butler is doing all of the heavy lifting in the Horizon, propping up the other schools financially. If we don't at least approach them we are doing ourselves a disservice. I hope we are proactive and try to make a splash.


If I am Elgin, I would push to get Butler and SLU to bring us to 12. It would increase viewership in Indiana and Missouri. ESPN would probably be more inclined to show top matchups in the MVC.

....a serious power move would be adding Butler, SLU, Dayton and Cleveland St.

West: UNI, MSU, SIU, SLU, Creighton, Wichita St. Drake,
East: Dayton, Cleveland St., Evansville, Indiana St., Butler, Illinois St., Bradley

This type of conference could get 3-4 bids every year. The added tv markets would be excellent as well.
BirdmanBB
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 1037
Joined: August 5th, 2010, 10:06 am

PreviousNext

Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Chuck A, Google [Bot] and 61 guests