CaseyGarrisonforPrez wrote: I picked us either second or third in the preseason but I really thought that we would win the Valley in the end. I thought Lusk would be a big upgrade over Cuonzo. But I don't think I was the only one. When you are the defending champ you should have high expectations. We have the facitlities and backing to be at the top of the Valley every year. If we aren't at a minimum top three every year then heads will roll eventually. This year really has me questioning Lusk now. Such an obvious great hire and so little results so far.
Are you serious about this?
Lusk is in his FIRST season!!! Has he ever been head coach at the collegiate level? It's not like you guys had a ton of talent returning! And Cuonzo was a pretty good coach - not sure what you're talking about here.
The newcomers have stepped in well, but sometimes you need a year to really gel.
I thought that BU and MSU would be about the same level not knowing how good your newcomers were and thinking that Geno's new recruits would be better, DSE would have a great year, and that Geno could do more with the current mix of players than Les did.
I'm sorry, but you thinking that the Bears would win the Valley in Lusk's 1st year is cray-ZAY! Of course, so was my prediction that the Bears would finish in the bottom 2 or 3 alongside BU.
I guess almost every Valley fan thinks their team should finish top 3 every year now. I think that's unrealistic in this current era unless you're Creighton or Wichita, who have proven to be consistent for a while now, have a tremendous fan base, and have an edge in recruiting.
It would have taken a miracle to outdo CU and WSU this year the way they've been playing - even if Missouri St. played as well as you and other Bears fans thought.