Rambler63 wrote:Yes, you're right. There are a LOT of nice WSU people. But their fan culture is dominated by assholes. Even their beat writer caters to the rabid assholes who dominate their fandom.
They ragged on Loyola for having bad attendance, but now they're in a conference with Tulane. Loyola got 600 more per game than their new conference mate, Tulane. And I'd wager Loyola will have pretty good attendance next year.
They ridiculed Loyola because "nobody in Chicago cares about Loyola." They do now. And the power of the nation's third largest media market is just now starting to come forward.
They trashed Doug Elgin for "replacing" Creighton with Loyola. Now Loyola has gone deeper in the NCAA Tournament than Creighton has ever gone. TV numbers are huge, because Loyola has blown up in Chicago.
I was lurking at Shockernet leading up to Arch Madness, and they were STILL trashing Loyola. "I'm so glad we're out of that conference" was a major theme.
So they get the 4 seed for finishing second, and crap the bed... just like the did when they got the 1 seed in the MVC. They think they have to be assholes to be winners.
BRAVO! And let's have the same enthusiasm when SIU or ISU does it next year, and Bradley the year after that, and Loyola maybe both years, and maybe Valpo or MSU a few years down the road. This is a solid conference, and I don't know how many times our teams have to prove it. Very proud of Bradley, btw, to be the last team to beat Loyola. That's gotten quite a bit of national attention, and that helps BU's program as well.