Different circumstances make differences. Altman has a long, proven track record. And while his last two years (three actually) were dissapointing, he has a long track record of success. Altman completely revitalized a dead Creighton program. And yes, he was successful at K-State. K-State fans just wanted more than is realistic in Manhattan. Following Altman, it took how many years for K-State to be successful? And they had to sell their souls to the Devil to do it. Huggins? It seems Frank Martin is finding it a little more difficult in Manhattan this year. So Dana Altman did a whole lot and he did it over time, two or three bad years happens.
Matt Painter was hand picked and fast tracked to take over the Purdue program, he was Keady's right hand man and sent to SIU simply to have HC on his resume. You can't compare his situation with that of Cuonzo Martin.
Cuonzo, however, is fast tracking to a HC position at the BCS level. He is cutting his teeth at MSU and he is proving himself. If Matt Painter surprised the world and stepped down tomorrow, Cuonzo would be in. Cuonzo also has the attention and personal relationships with HC's and AD's in basketball. He will make his move when the right move presents itself. He and Gregg Marshall are the two coaches in the Valley that have the most upward potential as of right now. In fact, Martin may have more than Marshall.
Jankovich would be another coach that would be fast tracked, but he hasn't shown any great success at Illinois State. And with players given to him like Sampay, Odiakosa, Eldridge and others, Jank inherited a potential S-16 or better team. That said, even with the talent he was given, nobody could blame a first year, first time head coach for not winning it all in the Valley. Again last year, still loaded to the gills, the Rebirds got closer and Jank was someone to look at. But without the overwhelming talent Jank enjoyed his first two years, Illinois State floundered. Either he isn't recruiting, developing players or strategizing at the midmajor level, something is amiss. I still think he has the potential to be a great coach and at a high BCS level, but even with all of his coaching connections, his star has faded.
Let me reitterate one thing, guys don't take Valley jobs because they want to end their carreers here. They do it to compete, be successful, win demonstrate their abilities and move up to a higher level. That goes for McDermott, Jacobson, Lowery, Les, Martin and even Marshall. Coaches are higly competitive and highly motivated. In any industry, guys like these coaches all want to compete and win at the highest level. Most CEO's of fortune 1,000 companies would step on their own mother's corpse for the opportunity to run Coca Cola, Proctor & Gamble or Bank of America. That said, all of them have taken their own approach to reaching that goal. And each coach has different situations that allow them a faster track to the big time and they all have different hurdles. Most will never sniff the BCS, a few will grow comfortable at the Valley level and some will fail at this level, that is how life works.
Here is an interesting link about Painter:
http://ncaabasketball.fanhouse.com/2010 ... -would-he/Back on track with the thread, I stand by my prediction of the under, Les is gone and possibly but not likely, Lowery. 1-1/2 is my number.