unipanther99 wrote:DoubleJayAlum wrote:unipanther99 wrote:DJA, it's like you're single-handedly trying to keep the rumor alive that going to D-2 was ever an option for UNI. Dannen's report clearly showed UNI going to D-2 would lose even more money.
And it is like you are completely incapable of accepting the fact that this was reported in a newspaper story that everyone read.
Why ignore everything else I said in my post about being a yes man? No comment on that whatsoever?
You've never been able to come up with a quote from a UNI official saying D-2 was a viable option.
Look, you can argue the viability of the option all you want. What has been shown here and on the old ValleyTalk was that Dannen specifically said it was a possibility. How possible? I don't know and, for the purposes of this particular discussion, it actually helps reinforce my comments about Dannen if it wasn't a viable option. The point I was making is that Dannen doesn't seem to think things through all that carefully before speaking and as a result, says things that occasionally hurt UNI's, and to a lesser extent the entire MVC's, image. Does it really help UNI to publicly say that dropping to D2 is an option (viable or not)? Does it help UNI or other MVC schools to publicly justify Iowa/ISU's decision to not play home and homes with MVC schools?
I have no idea how he manages the department as whole and it may be spectacular. However, his public PR skills seems to lack polish and forethought. As I said earlier, it would have been better if Dannen simply didn't say anything like the Drake AD apparently chose to do, rather than say what he did. As a Drake poster said above, Dannen essentially through the whole MVC under the bus with his comments and I'd wager that ADs at other schools completely disagree with his comments.