Other Conference Tourney Games

[Khan4Cats]

UMASS vs Temple (5)....Temple goes down 77-71. Should help to get a better seed for Creighton and WSU.

interesting, a Temple team that beat WSU helps WSU by losing. A San Diego State team that CU beat, needs to lose to help CU. Hopefully keeps them from being on or near the same seed lines.

[shocktheheart]

UMASS vs Temple (5)....Temple goes down 77-71. Should help to get a better seed for Creighton and WSU.

interesting, a Temple team that beat WSU helps WSU by losing. A San Diego State team that CU beat, needs to lose to help CU. Hopefully keeps them from being on or near the same seed lines.

RPI isn't going to move that much by one of the teams you played losing this late in the year. I think if you are close in seeding to one of the teams you have played, you would rather see them lose now in my opinion.

[shocktheheart]

(4)71 Indiana vs Wisconsin 79 (4) Don't know if this loss by Indiana will help either WSU or Creighton. Hopefully it will.

[shocktheheart]

FFO NC St. 67 vs Virgina 64 (9) Doesn't effect WSU or Creighton much, but some of the teams that were "in" may be out on the bubble. Keeps Virginia from making a run and possibly passing WSU or Creighton in seeding.

[shocktheheart]

(9) Alabama 63 vs Florida 66 (5)

[MVCfans]

How bad is the PAC-12? Colorado just won the conference tourney.

[Jet915]

How bad is the PAC-12? Colorado just won the conference tourney.

Reese Davis asked Joe Lunardi why Cal should even be an at-large because of their weak resume and Lunardi said something to the fact that "sometimes teams get in who shouldn't but I think they will get in." Pretty sad argument, hopefully the committee grows some balls and makes a statement by making the Pac-12 a one bid league. The committee in the past has excluded several mid-majors w/"weak" resumes who have good RPI's, let's see if they do the same with Cal.

[MVCfans]

How bad is the PAC-12? Colorado just won the conference tourney.

Reese Davis asked Joe Lunardi why Cal should even be an at-large because of their weak resume and Lunardi said something to the fact that "sometimes teams get in who shouldn't but I think they will get in." Pretty sad argument, hopefully the committee grows some balls and makes a statement by making the Pac-12 a one bid league. The committee in the past has excluded several mid-majors w/"weak" resumes who have good RPI's, let's see if they do the same with Cal.

Right. Said their strong RPI of 39 would get them in? WTF? What about MVC strong RPIs in the 20's and being left out in years past?