Creighton at Drake

Discuss the MVC hoops season here.

Re: Creighton at Drake

Postby WuShockNation » January 24th, 2013, 5:39 pm

Wrong thread, but why didnt Artino play against the Shox
User avatar
WuShockNation
MVC Bench Warmer
MVC Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 49
Joined: January 3rd, 2012, 6:47 pm

Re: Creighton at Drake

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: Creighton at Drake

Postby denjayfan1 » January 24th, 2013, 8:07 pm

WuShockNation wrote:Wrong thread, but why didnt Artino play against the Shox


My guess is that the coaches didn't think he could match the physicality of Orupke and Hall on defense.
User avatar
denjayfan1
MVC Role Player
MVC Role Player
 
Posts: 150
Joined: October 19th, 2010, 9:27 pm

Re: Creighton at Drake

Postby Ace Dad » January 24th, 2013, 8:09 pm

Ricardo del Rio wrote:
WestOmahaBluejay wrote:Well I am hoping that at the end of the season this game can be looked back as just one of those nights where Creighton just had a little stumble along the way, and that its not a sign of bigger issues. I think the depth issues with the loss of Josh Jones is starting to rear its head a little bit with this team (this isn't an excuse for CU's two straight losses of course, but definitely a contributing factor - and every team has to go through it during a point through the season). Especially with Ethan Wragge appearing to being entering into his usual mid-season shooting slump, CU is lacking a real go-to-guy off the bench. This is an issue that Greg McDermott needs to shore up for the Jays to have any chance to get back on top of the Valley and make any type of run in the tournament in March - players like Nevin Johnson, Dingman and Artino need to step it up, and fast (also something to note is the lack of playing time for Andre Yates - don't know what happened there).

I guess one good thing is that this 2 game skid has certainly tempered the fan-bases' expectations, which is a good thing especially with all the talk before the WSU game of an "undefeated conference season" and the like. The Valley regular season title is definitely still within reach, the Jays just need to get it back together and take care of business like they were before the loss in Wichita. The Valley certainly isn't one of the stronger conferences in the country top to bottom, but still on any given night - a perceived "Thursday night team" can still bring their A game and knock off one of the teams at the top - its the fun of college basketball - whether its good or not for the conference can be debated on Selection Sunday (and even then, the team that put itself in that "bubble" position only needs to look into the mirror and blame itself).


It is difficult to play with only seven players. Starters + Wragge + Dingman. Yes, I am aware of Artino.

When foul trouble arises, trouble ensues.
With only seven players, fatigue ensues. Then tired shots and reduced defensive effort follows.

Did I run off into the ditch with these comments?



Your coach can go deeper on the bench.
There is no difference between basketball and life. Give both your best and ignore the "fans" on the sideline.
User avatar
Ace Dad
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 1290
Joined: October 21st, 2010, 9:10 am

Re: Creighton at Drake

Postby WestOmahaBluejay » January 24th, 2013, 9:30 pm

Ricardo del Rio wrote:
WestOmahaBluejay wrote:Well I am hoping that at the end of the season this game can be looked back as just one of those nights where Creighton just had a little stumble along the way, and that its not a sign of bigger issues. I think the depth issues with the loss of Josh Jones is starting to rear its head a little bit with this team (this isn't an excuse for CU's two straight losses of course, but definitely a contributing factor - and every team has to go through it during a point through the season). Especially with Ethan Wragge appearing to being entering into his usual mid-season shooting slump, CU is lacking a real go-to-guy off the bench. This is an issue that Greg McDermott needs to shore up for the Jays to have any chance to get back on top of the Valley and make any type of run in the tournament in March - players like Nevin Johnson, Dingman and Artino need to step it up, and fast (also something to note is the lack of playing time for Andre Yates - don't know what happened there).

I guess one good thing is that this 2 game skid has certainly tempered the fan-bases' expectations, which is a good thing especially with all the talk before the WSU game of an "undefeated conference season" and the like. The Valley regular season title is definitely still within reach, the Jays just need to get it back together and take care of business like they were before the loss in Wichita. The Valley certainly isn't one of the stronger conferences in the country top to bottom, but still on any given night - a perceived "Thursday night team" can still bring their A game and knock off one of the teams at the top - its the fun of college basketball - whether its good or not for the conference can be debated on Selection Sunday (and even then, the team that put itself in that "bubble" position only needs to look into the mirror and blame itself).


It is difficult to play with only seven players. Starters + Wragge + Dingman. Yes, I am aware of Artino.

When foul trouble arises, trouble ensues.
With only seven players, fatigue ensues. Then tired shots and reduced defensive effort follows.

Did I run off into the ditch with these comments?


Your comments make plenty of sense... the Jays bench was already short when the season started, then Jones is forced to leave the team, and a player that could play quality minutes and bring a spark to the team was lost. Like I stated above, teams lose players to various issues - whether its health or off the court actions, etc, so something like this has to be expected and planned for. The appearance of slow development in the "other" bench players such as Nevin Johnson and Andre Yates has contributed to the starters playing long minutes, hence wearing them down - which leads to "reduced defensive effort" which in turn leads to more fouls\foul trouble.

For CU to be successful the rest of the season, the bench players need to step up and play more quality minutes. Wragge and Dingman obviously have shown on the floor that they can step up when they are needed to in most cases, but Artino, Johnson and to an even greater extent Yates have not proven that - even though the two latter players came into this season with high hopes. I still think Johnson has a ton of potential and the growing pains he is facing on the floor are what most freshmen are faced with... but unless he steps it up, the starters are going to be faced with longer minutes down the stretch... which isn't a good thing in a marathon like the college basketball season is. Slumps will come and go, but the Jays last night fell victim to a Drake team that was sparked by a very productive bench - in fact from what I saw - the Drake bench players were the X-factor in the game.
Last edited by WestOmahaBluejay on January 24th, 2013, 9:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
WestOmahaBluejay
MVC Role Player
MVC Role Player
 
Posts: 80
Joined: March 16th, 2012, 10:40 am
Location: Omaha, NE

Re: Creighton at Drake

Postby DUBulldog » January 24th, 2013, 9:31 pm

Very surprised that Drake was able to beat Creighton without shooting very well (8-22 from 3, 18-30 from the line). DU definitely played with more toughness than I've seen all season.

Phelps might have saved his job with that game, but it means nothing if they can't continue playing that way. It definitely looked like he had lost the team in the loss at UNI. The 30 point margin was much deceiving....it really wasn't that close.
User avatar
DUBulldog
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2787
Joined: August 4th, 2010, 10:17 pm

Re: Creighton at Drake

Postby DUBulldog » January 24th, 2013, 9:34 pm

WestOmahaBluejay wrote:Slumps will come and go, but the Jays last night fell victim to a Drake team that was sparked by a very productive bench - in fact from what I saw - the Drake bench players were the X-factor in the game that was the difference.


Phelps shortened the bench a little compared to most games.....but DU had 3 bench players step up big time for a combined 43 points...

Richard Carter 20 points, 7 rebounds (Drake's point guards had 11 rebounds in the game)
Daddy Ugbede 12 points, 5 rebounds
Jeremy Jeffers 11 points

Bulldogs haven't shown it often, but there's a lot of fairly talented players on the team.....Phelps just hasn't been able to consistently meld them into a cohesive unit.
User avatar
DUBulldog
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2787
Joined: August 4th, 2010, 10:17 pm

Re: Creighton at Drake

Postby shoxrox » January 24th, 2013, 11:21 pm

horacepinker wrote:I wonder what Jays26 and DeanthonyBowden have to say about this loss? Too bad one is MIA and the other is sailing to the south of France on his yacht.


I'm concerned with the whereabouts of DoubleJayAlum and LJay. I think this may be a record of consecutive hours without a DoubleJay post on here. And LJay hasn't posted in close to a week.

Guess this really came out of left field for a few and it has affected their psyches.
USA Today Coaches Top 25 Poll Conference Breakdown:

MVC: 1
WCC: 1
Atlantic Ten: 1
MWC: 1
Big East: 1

The Big East is Big Time.
shoxrox
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 868
Joined: November 1st, 2012, 10:39 am

Re: Creighton at Drake

Postby valleychamp » January 24th, 2013, 11:25 pm

shoxrox is totally a new poster, you guys. He has absolutely no idea who wsubballer is...
UNI FIGHT
User avatar
valleychamp
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 1836
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 3:02 pm

Re: Creighton at Drake

Postby shoxrox » January 24th, 2013, 11:30 pm

valleychamp wrote:shoxrox is totally a new poster, you guys. He has absolutely no idea who wsubballer is...


You've stated this before. What's your point?

Again, great addition to the thread, Panther fan. Why don't you go back to your board and get excited about your new renewed at-large chances your fan base is again clamoring about.

P.S. Maybe you're in need of a name change. A bit out-dated... :Bam:
USA Today Coaches Top 25 Poll Conference Breakdown:

MVC: 1
WCC: 1
Atlantic Ten: 1
MWC: 1
Big East: 1

The Big East is Big Time.
shoxrox
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 868
Joined: November 1st, 2012, 10:39 am

Re: Creighton at Drake

Postby valleychamp » January 24th, 2013, 11:48 pm

shoxrox wrote:
valleychamp wrote:shoxrox is totally a new poster, you guys. He has absolutely no idea who wsubballer is...


You've stated this before. What's your point?

Again, great addition to the thread, Panther fan. Why don't you go back to your board and get excited about your new renewed at-large chances your fan base is again clamoring about.

P.S. Maybe you're in need of a name change. A bit out-dated... :Bam:


baller,

My point is for you to finally man up and admit that you are on your 3rd username on this board. Which, btw, is something that you would have just loved to attack someone else for if they did the same. Its funny that you continue to lie about who you are, while at the same time you are not capable of reeling in your e-personality one single bit while doing so, which makes is so laughably obvious to everyone that its you.

Change my name? Nah, I've got nothing to hide on here. That stuff is for guys like you to do. Maybe you should head back to shockernet and tattle to everyone over there about how bad this place is like you usually do (while simultaneously being one of the most frequent posters here).

I have asked you before, but what is your infatuation with the "UNI at-large" talk. Can you tell me what anyone said, anywhere, which was outlandish regarding this topic? You have clung to this nonexistent meme for many weeks now, rubbing it in people's faces (who, idk?) as if they had previously been talking junk or making crazy predictions.
UNI FIGHT
User avatar
valleychamp
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 1836
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 3:02 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BigMacAttack, Google Adsense [Bot] and 72 guests