agrinut wrote:That is a ridiculous statistic! Only loses are too Ranked Creighton in the Stl and the national champs.
That is crazy. Wow.
agrinut wrote:That is a ridiculous statistic! Only loses are too Ranked Creighton in the Stl and the national champs.
bleach wrote:I guess we saw different games. My 16 yr old son and I both thought the Shox looked very beatable. We both rode the Shox final 4 ride last year but thought they looked REAL good 4 players deep and there wasn't much else this year. Tenn isn't very good (not poor by any means) and played the Shox equal.
Not saying they won't win the league but expected a little more depth to be there.
Ricardo del Rio wrote:agrinut wrote:rlh04d wrote:Shocker fans really need to cool down the arrogance.
Anywho, incredible game. Cotton single handedly took that game over and won it at the end. His block on an easy layup with the and-one on the other side completely changed the momentum.
First 10-0 start in WSU history. Amazing.
Cotton was incredible, if he can continue to be a threat offensively Wichita will be extremely tough to guard. Just a question, does Early need to be sit down so he can reevaluate where he is on the team. He seems selfish the times I've watched him this year, low BBIQ.
The last shot that Early took was straight out of the dumb department. What in the hell was he thinking, besides point padding.
Black wrote:agrinut wrote:That is a ridiculous statistic! Only loses are too Ranked Creighton in the Stl and the national champs.
That is crazy. Wow.
Wufan wrote:Wushockduke wrote:Cotton is a stud.
Glad the Shocks won, but that dunk from Tennessee, I think it was McRae?, that should have been worth 4 points! Wow!
Hats off to him for that dunk! Hats off to the crowd for taunting him to the point that he screamed a profanity afterward and got T'd up.
rlh04d wrote:Black wrote:agrinut wrote:That is a ridiculous statistic! Only loses are too Ranked Creighton in the Stl and the national champs.
That is crazy. Wow.
And the teams those 25 wins came against:
VCU - 26
Iowa - 59
AF - 83
Pitt - 44
Gonzaga - 7
La Salle - 30
Ohio State - 8
BYU - (22)
Saint Louis - (30)
Oral Roberts - (91)
Tennessee - (51)
Three losses last season were to Tennessee (66), Creighton (23), and Louisville (2). (This year's RPI's from RPI Forecast.) 28 games career games and Baker has a 11-3 record against top 100 RPI teams, 7-2 against top 50.
rlh04d wrote:bleach wrote:Not saying they won't win the league but expected a little more depth to be there.
10-0 isn't impressive to you? 4-0 record against top 100 RPI teams? WSU has 4 of the Valley's 9 top 100 RPI wins, and two of the three top 50 wins (and that's not even counting Tennessee, who are forecast as #51). There are certainly weaknesses, but let's be real ... this is one of the best starts in Valley history.
I do think our depth is a bit off right now. I think Darius Carter is starting to come on, though, which is pretty typical for a JUCO newcomer adjusting to D1 ball. Coleby's been a bit of a disappointment for me, as has Wessel, and Wiggins is off-and-on. Lufile is much better than I expected, though.
bleach wrote:I guess we saw different games. My 16 yr old son and I both thought the Shox looked very beatable. We both rode the Shox final 4 ride last year but thought they looked REAL good 4 players deep and there wasn't much else this year. Tenn isn't very good (not poor by any means) and played the Shox equal.
Not saying they won't win the league but expected a little more depth to be there.
bleach wrote:Never said I wasn't impressed.
Said I thought the first 4 were REAL good.
Said I expected more depth.
I don't think this team at this point is as good as last year, that's all.
bleach wrote:rlh04d wrote:bleach wrote:Not saying they won't win the league but expected a little more depth to be there.
10-0 isn't impressive to you? 4-0 record against top 100 RPI teams? WSU has 4 of the Valley's 9 top 100 RPI wins, and two of the three top 50 wins (and that's not even counting Tennessee, who are forecast as #51). There are certainly weaknesses, but let's be real ... this is one of the best starts in Valley history.
I do think our depth is a bit off right now. I think Darius Carter is starting to come on, though, which is pretty typical for a JUCO newcomer adjusting to D1 ball. Coleby's been a bit of a disappointment for me, as has Wessel, and Wiggins is off-and-on. Lufile is much better than I expected, though.
Never said I wasn't impressed.
Said I thought the first 4 were REAL good.
Said I expected more depth.
I don't think this team at this point is as good as last year, that's all.
2livewu wrote:
You and your 16 year old son don't know squat about basketball.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: BUFanatic, dabirds0987, Google [Bot] and 23 guests