IllinoisState wrote:freddycat68 wrote:The A10 for Loyola was a horrible choice. It's one thing for a team like Creighton to go to the Big East. Great choice and nobody can quarrel with it. Loyola is more like Tulsa or WSU ... taking its fleeting success and making a lateral move. Without the stellar coaches who made them flashes, Tulsa and WSU now languish in conferences where they are also-rans when they could just have well stayed put and helped build the Valley into a better conference. I wish Loyola well, but I don't understand this move. Hey, we can make the Final Four from this conference -- let's go make ourselves a new and unproven commodity in another mid-major league! Makes no sense.
I don't blame them. The A-10 has like minded institutions and they are like notre Dame with the ACC in that it brings eyes from the east coast. Plus the conference is a little better.
unipanther99 wrote:We have the quality basketball program addition now in Murray State. Now it’s time to scratch the market and western itch and go with either Kansas City or UT-Arlington.
SalukiWorld wrote:Looks like UT Arlington is heading to the WAC
https://twitter.com/PeteThamel/status/1 ... 8556550151
VUGrad1314 wrote:Matt Brown and Matt Norlander both seem to think it's UIC. I wish we would have evaluated the Dakotas but maybe we did and they either were found to be unable to deal with the extra costs (like Milwaukee or NKU) or were uninterested given how the conference situation caters so well to them. There is a lot to like about UIC especially institutionally and in sports outside of men's basketball so maybe they'll be a good add and of course remaining in Chicago is important and perhaps even more so now as others have said.
MVCfans wrote:SalukiWorld wrote:Looks like UT Arlington is heading to the WAC
https://twitter.com/PeteThamel/status/1 ... 8556550151
MVC must have passed. If we add, it almost has to be UIC, right?
E-Villan wrote:IllinoisState wrote:freddycat68 wrote:The A10 for Loyola was a horrible choice. It's one thing for a team like Creighton to go to the Big East. Great choice and nobody can quarrel with it. Loyola is more like Tulsa or WSU ... taking its fleeting success and making a lateral move. Without the stellar coaches who made them flashes, Tulsa and WSU now languish in conferences where they are also-rans when they could just have well stayed put and helped build the Valley into a better conference. I wish Loyola well, but I don't understand this move. Hey, we can make the Final Four from this conference -- let's go make ourselves a new and unproven commodity in another mid-major league! Makes no sense.
I don't blame them. The A-10 has like minded institutions and they are like notre Dame with the ACC in that it brings eyes from the east coast. Plus the conference is a little better.
I am not saying this to bag on Loyola at all. Nothing but respect for what they have done since coming here, but with the addition of Belmont and Murray, I would have no interest in leaving the MVC for the A-10. What little they are ahead right now in Men's Basketball wouldn't make up for the additional travel, and lack of exposure to our fans. There are a lot of small, empty gyms up and down the east coast, and I am not too sure any of their non-revenue sports are better than ours. Certainly not baseball. Not to mention what happens if SLU or Dayton ends up in the Big East?
Everything in consideration, as a fan, from top to bottom, I like us better.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 23 guests