valleychamp wrote:IMO, the SEC declining to take A&M at this point is not a matter of not wanting them, but it is a matter of not having a 14th team to add yet. If I were to guess, if the SEC can get another team to come along with A&M, this will happen. You simply can't add 1 team and go to 13 teams if you are SEC.
Very true. This is an arms race for which BCS conference survives and having odd numbers isn't going to work. The SEC would need one more in the West and one in the East. Adding one school qould simply cause problems and animosity. It wouldn't be long before schools from the West were complaining because they had one extra team, meanwhile, scheduling would become a nightmare. The last thing that the SEC would want to do is create a problem when no problems currently exist.
The bottom line is that the most credible long term scenario that has been mentioned is four BCS leagues with 16 teams each. Teh Big 10 isn't going anywhere, the Pac 12 isn't, neither is the SEC. OF the three remaining, the ACC, the Big East and the Big 12, it will be who is the last man standing. Two years ago, I would have guessed the Big XII and the ACC a close second. Now I believe the Big XII will die first, followed by the Big East and then the remainder of the ACC will finally funnel into the SEC and Big 10. There will be no place for schools like Seton Hall.
The Big XII is on borrowed time, but on a better note, if all of this plays out, this will create opportunities for additional Big time basketball conferences. This ordeal isn't over, it's just beginning. It will be a fun ride!
There are three rules that I live by, never get less than 12 hours sleep, never gamble with a guy who has the same first name as a city and never get involved with a chick with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Stick to that and everything else is gravy!