MVC Games Week 10 2024-25

[chitown fanatic]

There is a passion I havent seen in years from the Aces in this thread....

[AcesAces]

They lost the game in question. Calling a person stupid on here doesn't make you appear intelligent. Just the opposite.

[ValpoDad]

Folks dont believe the ESPN attendance number... as a live witness id say about 800 off. Had some noise. Not chirping- we could have lost. But as I mentioned a few weeks ago Better lace them up tight Valpo is not an easy out this year.

The home team reports the attendance number.

Of course...Saying that the number reported cant be accurate in this case. Saturday reported 1900. visibly as many or more on wed and report was 1400... dont know if walk ups or students dont make the attendance number or what. One of those numbers was wrong

[Aces44]

They lost the game in question. Calling a person stupid on here doesn't make you appear intelligent. Just the opposite.

You keep acting like it was some huge problem, when the very next game proved there isn’t one.

How stupid can you get?

[AcesAces]

They lost the game in question. Calling a person stupid on here doesn't make you appear intelligent. Just the opposite.

You keep acting like it was some huge problem, when the very next game proved there isn’t one.

How stupid can you get?

It was a huge problem as they lost that game. Keep using the term stupid all you want. That's all you not me. You are clearly mad and upset that I dare criticize anything to do with the Aces. Pathetic.

[Aces44]

They lost the game in question. Calling a person stupid on here doesn't make you appear intelligent. Just the opposite.

You keep acting like it was some huge problem, when the very next game proved there isn’t one.

How stupid can you get?

It was a huge problem as they lost that game. Keep using the term stupid all you want. That's all you not me. You are clearly mad and upset that I dare criticize anything to do with the Aces. Pathetic.

Cam was 1 for 6 in his 22 min up to that point you Dum Dum.

You think just running him out there guaranteed a win?

Stop while you are behind!

[AcesAces]

So what? He is one of only 3 MVC ready guards. You don't take out players who are having a bad game if you are thin on the bench. Plus, you have to let players play through these issues. It is aa part of the game.

No, putting him back out there wouldn't have guaranteed a win but the odds suggest they had a much better chance. That's one of the reasons why he starts and gets many minutes.

I am not behind. You are being hammered on this. You sound as if you know nothing about basketball or sports.

[Aces44]

So what? He is one of only 3 MVC ready guards. You don't take out players who are having a bad game if you are thin on the bench. Plus, you have to let players play through these issues. It is aa part of the game.

No, putting him back out there wouldn't have guaranteed a win but the odds suggest they had a much better chance. That's one of the reasons why he starts and gets many minutes.

I am not behind. You are being hammered on this. You sound as if you know nothing about basketball or sports.

You’ve never coached. You are guessing completely and it shows.

You keep acting like playing him would guarantee a win and now you admit it wouldn’t.

I can’t help you anymore if you aren’t smart enough to read your own posts

[AcesAces]

So what? He is one of only 3 MVC ready guards. You don't take out players who are having a bad game if you are thin on the bench. Plus, you have to let players play through these issues. It is aa part of the game.

No, putting him back out there wouldn't have guaranteed a win but the odds suggest they had a much better chance. That's one of the reasons why he starts and gets many minutes.

I am not behind. You are being hammered on this. You sound as if you know nothing about basketball or sports.

You’ve never coached. You are guessing completely and it shows.

You keep acting like playing him would guarantee a win and now you admit it wouldn’t.

I can’t help you anymore if you aren’t smart enough to read your own posts

So what? Most people have never coached. You've never coached UE or college. Pee Wee ball doesn't count.

I'm not guessing. Nothing in any of my comments is false or a guess.

Once again, I never said playing him would have guaranteed a win. Given that this year's team has only 3 MVC-ready guards (which I have told you about 6X), it couldn't have hurt and definitely improves the odds of winning.

[Aces44]

So what? He is one of only 3 MVC ready guards. You don't take out players who are having a bad game if you are thin on the bench. Plus, you have to let players play through these issues. It is aa part of the game.

No, putting him back out there wouldn't have guaranteed a win but the odds suggest they had a much better chance. That's one of the reasons why he starts and gets many minutes.

I am not behind. You are being hammered on this. You sound as if you know nothing about basketball or sports.

You’ve never coached. You are guessing completely and it shows.

You keep acting like playing him would guarantee a win and now you admit it wouldn’t.

I can’t help you anymore if you aren’t smart enough to read your own posts

So what? Most people have never coached. You've never coached UE or college. Pee Wee ball doesn't count.

I'm not guessing. Nothing in any of my comments is false or a guess.

Once again, I never said playing him would have guaranteed a win. Given that this year's team has only 3 MVC-ready guards (which I have told you about 6X), it couldn't have hurt and definitely improves the odds of winning.

Give it a rest. You are wrong about so many things in this post.

Such an odd hill to die on also