rlh04d wrote:uniftw wrote:1. Release the best recruit the program had ever signed (a top 150 recruit) who had all of the potential to be the best player in UNI history coming out of HS like they did to a big conference rival. Not only releasing him, but taking the recruiting set back as there hadn't been much recruiting for post players since he was signed/committed thus setting UNI back a couple years in post depth.
Umm ... I don't know about that.
ESPN: 28th at his position and no national ranking.
Scout: 3*, 35th at his position.
Rivals: 3*, no rankings at all.
I can't find anything else for him. UNI fans have a legit argument about McDermott being forced to sit out, but let's be real here ... he wasn't a big recruit. He wasn't top 150 in the nation, and there was zero reason for anyone to think he was going to be one of the best recruits in UNI history. He was an average recruit who didn't even start for his HS team until his senior year. Don't change history to make it sound like this was a big deal when it happened.
At one point he was a top 150, but fell out.Redbirdfan21 wrote:rlh04d wrote:uniftw wrote:1. Release the best recruit the program had ever signed (a top 150 recruit) who had all of the potential to be the best player in UNI history coming out of HS like they did to a big conference rival. Not only releasing him, but taking the recruiting set back as there hadn't been much recruiting for post players since he was signed/committed thus setting UNI back a couple years in post depth.
Umm ... I don't know about that.
ESPN: 28th at his position and no national ranking.
Scout: 3*, 35th at his position.
Rivals: 3*, no rankings at all.
I can't find anything else for him. UNI fans have a legit argument about McDermott being forced to sit out, but let's be real here ... he wasn't a big recruit. He wasn't top 150 in the nation, and there was zero reason for anyone to think he was going to be one of the best recruits in UNI history. He was an average recruit who didn't even start for his HS team until his senior year. Don't change history to make it sound like this was a big deal when it happened.
I could be wrong (wouldn't be the first time) but I believe Scout ranks each position "in order", meaning the 35th best SF would be the 175th ranked player ( #35 SF * 5 positions to be ranked).
Redbirdfan21 wrote:rlh04d wrote:uniftw wrote:1. Release the best recruit the program had ever signed (a top 150 recruit) who had all of the potential to be the best player in UNI history coming out of HS like they did to a big conference rival. Not only releasing him, but taking the recruiting set back as there hadn't been much recruiting for post players since he was signed/committed thus setting UNI back a couple years in post depth.
Umm ... I don't know about that.
ESPN: 28th at his position and no national ranking.
Scout: 3*, 35th at his position.
Rivals: 3*, no rankings at all.
I can't find anything else for him. UNI fans have a legit argument about McDermott being forced to sit out, but let's be real here ... he wasn't a big recruit. He wasn't top 150 in the nation, and there was zero reason for anyone to think he was going to be one of the best recruits in UNI history. He was an average recruit who didn't even start for his HS team until his senior year. Don't change history to make it sound like this was a big deal when it happened.
I could be wrong (wouldn't be the first time) but I believe Scout ranks each position "in order", meaning the 35th best SF would be the 175th ranked player ( #35 SF * 5 positions to be ranked).
Redbirdfan21 wrote:I could be wrong (wouldn't be the first time) but I believe Scout ranks each position "in order", meaning the 35th best SF would be the 175th ranked player ( #35 SF * 5 positions to be ranked).
mvcfan wrote:I don't remember Teddy ever being a Top 150. He think that he was around 200.
rlh04d wrote:Redbirdfan21 wrote:I could be wrong (wouldn't be the first time) but I believe Scout ranks each position "in order", meaning the 35th best SF would be the 175th ranked player ( #35 SF * 5 positions to be ranked).
I think you're right. I've never noticed that before. What a weird way to do it.
McDermott was likely a top 200 player. Maybe "average" recruit was too harsh. He was a good recruit, but saying "best in UNI history" is going a bit crazy with it. If that's the case, UNI fans must be phenomenally scared of Fred Van Vleet (top 90 by at least ESPN and Scout).
League commissioner Doug Elgin said Illinois State proposed the Valley to grant Hawkins partial relief from the two-year rule by allowing him to play in every game during the 2014-15 season except the Redbirds' two regular-season matchups against Wichita State. A committee of five league officials met about the request for three hours and ultimately decided to grant it last week.
Redbirdfan21 wrote:Can we put to rest that ISU fans should be kissing Marshall's feet for "allowing" Teddy to play at all now???
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaab-the ... um=twitterLeague commissioner Doug Elgin said Illinois State proposed the Valley to grant Hawkins partial relief from the two-year rule by allowing him to play in every game during the 2014-15 season except the Redbirds' two regular-season matchups against Wichita State. A committee of five league officials met about the request for three hours and ultimately decided to grant it last week.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], pafan and 19 guests