freddycat68 wrote:Anyway Bradley beat Drake tonight and moved into 4th. BU looks like one of 3 favorites next season, along with the 2 newcomers. Wardle needs to do the conference right next season and beat up on non-cons before the conference season.
SalukiWorld wrote:The best way to figure out the Missouri Valley is how teams are doing against the top 5 teams in the league:
Northern Iowa: 3-2 (Left to play: 3)
Loyola: 2-3 (Left to play: 3)
Missouri St: 4-2 (Left to play: 2)
Drake: 2-5 (Left to play: 1)
Bradley: 4-3 (Left to play: 1)
SIU: 0-8 (Left to play: 2)
Illinois St: 2-5 (Left to play: 3)
Valpo: 1-6 (Left to play: 3)
Indiana St: 2-5 (Left to play: 3)
Evansville: 0-7 (Left to play: 3)
To me, Drake and SIU are the 2 most disappointing teams in the Valley and it's reflected here
Kyle_Saluki_17 wrote:We are all disappointed with SIU's lack of ability to beat any top teams, but a team that was picked to get 5th will get 6th. Not inspiring at all, but just wanted to put this in perspective. Drake was picked preseason #1, and is currently in 5th. They still have a decent chance of winning at the Arch though.
VUGrad1314 wrote:Fair points Campbellproud but I have to think there was way more at play here than just basketball. The institutional considerations are too great to ignore for Loyola I think. Not only do they get to be with more private (and Jesuit) schools they also get to recruit the east coast much more heavily now for students and athletes. I think the same reasons why SLU did not want to leave the A10 are the same reasons Loyola wanted to join it. I think they had planned to add Belmont and Murray State beforehand (but I am much more confident on Belmont with that because I'm pretty sure the announcement that Belmont was coming was before Loyola announced its departure. Murray State is a bit less clear as their addition really started to heat up after Loyola announced its departure. Before that there was a lot of whining about market and academics from anything that was publicly shared and it really felt like the market based adds were being talked about quite a bit more. It's possible that this was overblown and that football was the actual holdup (as many others also suspected) but it does make sense in light of Loyola's departure that at least one future addition had to center basketball prowess at the forefront. There is no doubt that Loyola's departure paved the way for UIC but with Murray the picture is less clear. We'll never truly know but there is certainly reason to suspect that.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 158 guests