RoyalShock wrote:DoubleJayAlum wrote:Haha wrote:Instead of posting home games why don't you post SOS, specifically out of conference. Thanks
On top of that he has said consistently that WSU had chances and they just didn't get it done.
However we all know this league blows big ones. You can sit back and say WSU isn't doing much either but one thing you can't say is that a loss to WSU in the last two years would have been a killer in the RPI. Nor can you say a win over WSU didn't count as a quality win the last two years.
All marshall has said about any school wanting to hire him was that he was contacted by 3 schools, had further contact with 2, and had even more conversations with 1.
WSU did have the best noncon this past season. Of course, it was propped up by the MWC-MVC challenge game against San Diego St and the exempt tourney. Take those away and the noncon schedule really doesn't look much different than most of the other Valley schools.
Those games (Maui, SDSU) were scheduled before most of the home non-con, so Marshall already knew he was going to have tough games. The main point is that TylerDurden tried to deride our non-con using select games, completely ignoring the fact WSU had the best SOS in the conference, even before the post-season.
But to address your point, you can't just say, had WSU not played the exempt tourney and SDSU the schedule would look like the other Valley schools. Take those school's 2-3 best RPI games away and then compare. That would be apples-to-apples.
Having the best SOS in the MVC this year is like being the tallest midget. You're still a midget. At the end of the season, WSU didn't have the best SOS anyway -- Indiana State did. But that's not the point.
http://statsheet.com/mcb/rankings/RPI
http://www.rpiratings.com/mensrpi.html
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/bkt1011.htm
I was pointing out the irony of a coach's statement...and deriding a bit. But it's deserved if you're looking at this from a global perspective.
He's saying that WSU did it's part, which is clearly not true. WSU showed its ability during the NIT...the problem was that WSU had NCAA tournament talent and I think most everyone here knew it.
WSU was hands-down the preseason pick. They needed to schedule like it. They did not. They under-scheduled for the team they had.
They gave themselves two chances - vs. UConn in Maui and at SDSU (which was scheduled for them).
WSU CHOSE to play the weak teams at home, which is what I pointed out. They had other options. They may not have been BCS teams, but they had options that would have made their schedule better -- enough so they would be in the at-large conversation.
WSU fans are a bit sensitive when anyone calls out their coach - but when he decides to call out people, it can be scrutinized.
Listen, I understand that MVC teams can't generally get home games with BCS teams. I get it. But there are more that two options. It's not BCS or bottom feeder.
I happened to be using WSU as the example, because of the statements their coach made and the expectations of that team, but you could replace WSU with any MVC team.