BradleyFan71 wrote:With the addition of a 10th team, doesn't that make it easier to get Murray in next season, or is it a 75% vote?
Cdizzle wrote:BradleyFan71 wrote:With the addition of a 10th team, doesn't that make it easier to get Murray in next season, or is it a 75% vote?
Interesting question. If Valpo is now a voting member, you've just shifted the balance for the public addition(s) many are hoping for even more in to the hands of the private schools.
tribecalledquest wrote:Cdizzle wrote:BradleyFan71 wrote:With the addition of a 10th team, doesn't that make it easier to get Murray in next season, or is it a 75% vote?
Interesting question. If Valpo is now a voting member, you've just shifted the balance for the public addition(s) many are hoping for even more in to the hands of the private schools.
I think people keep assuming the MVC private schools would prefer to go D3 than compete in men's basketball. That's not true at all. It's a good story the public school people can lean on though.
BradleyFan71 wrote:Clearly not to the extent of going D3, but it's fairly obvious some private schools wanted things the way they are today. My post was actually the opposite, as Valpo being the new guy may be more open to voting for Murray.
tribecalledquest wrote:BradleyFan71 wrote:Clearly not to the extent of going D3, but it's fairly obvious some private schools wanted things the way they are today. My post was actually the opposite, as Valpo being the new guy may be more open to voting for Murray.
The vote was unanimous supposedly. There were five public (UNI, MSU, SIU, ISU and ISUb) who voted. Did the four private schools give those other five wet willies until they broke down and submitted to the private's wishes? The public schools had MORE votes than the privates. Putting this all on a weak vision of private schools is a joke.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 29 guests