VUGrad1314 wrote:According to Ed Marlowe on Twitter Murray State UMKC and UT-Arlington will be presenting to the MVC presidents on December 19. Of these I really only want Murray State. We need to expand our consideration list beyond these three. I hate that we're honing in on Arlington and UMKC so early. We should take a stronger look at potential candidates.
VUGrad1314 wrote:According to Ed Marlowe on Twitter Murray State UMKC and UT-Arlington will be presenting to the MVC presidents on December 19. Of these I really only want Murray State. We need to expand our consideration list beyond these three. I hate that we're honing in on Arlington and UMKC so early. We should take a stronger look at potential candidates.
IllinoisState wrote:Salukimadness86 wrote:Kyle_Saluki_17 wrote:It would seem that both Kansas City and UT Arlington would need to commit money into their programs to be able to join. I don't know what is standard for these types of moves, but I hope that we require both of them to spend above the median MVC budget, whatever that number is, to build their program to make sure that they are at least serious about basketball. Granted, money doesn't always equal results, but in general is a pretty good indicator of success. And of course, that they have commit to having nice facilities. This COULD turn into a good thing if they commit recourses like Loyola did.
And...Bring in Murray. Just do it.
Agree. Bring in Murray State, NKU, UIC and then another private. Perhaps Oakland?
Oakland is public. Detroit? Lipscomb? Bellarmine?
IllinoisState wrote:Salukimadness86 wrote:Kyle_Saluki_17 wrote:It would seem that both Kansas City and UT Arlington would need to commit money into their programs to be able to join. I don't know what is standard for these types of moves, but I hope that we require both of them to spend above the median MVC budget, whatever that number is, to build their program to make sure that they are at least serious about basketball. Granted, money doesn't always equal results, but in general is a pretty good indicator of success. And of course, that they have commit to having nice facilities. This COULD turn into a good thing if they commit recourses like Loyola did.
And...Bring in Murray. Just do it.
Agree. Bring in Murray State, NKU, UIC and then another private. Perhaps Oakland?
Oakland is public. Detroit? Lipscomb? Bellarmine?
racernation wrote:On the podcast, there was a mention of a fourth team that was "withheld". I bet it's NKU. It fits the footprint, is in a nice market size, they have over 14,000 students. And great facilities. Assuming Murray is next, I'd have NKU before Kansas City and Arlington.
ColonialBulldog wrote:racernation wrote:On the podcast, there was a mention of a fourth team that was "withheld". I bet it's NKU. It fits the footprint, is in a nice market size, they have over 14,000 students. And great facilities. Assuming Murray is next, I'd have NKU before Kansas City and Arlington.
I think context clues make it clear he was not talking about NKU. He says that NkU makes sense to him but then goes on to say he's not going to reveal the 4th team. While not mutually exclusive those are pretty contradictory.
BCPanther wrote:The metroplex is blowing up in population.
Milwaukee is in decline and aging.
I think Arlington is the much better add from nearly every angle.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 143 guests