That post might be more delusional than the guy on the other thread that thinks Chris Lowry would have SIU in the Final Four.
Nobody ever hated Loyola, we were underwhelmed by the add and to Loyola's credit they proved us all wrong. Good for them, good for the league. You just flat weren't around long enough for anybody to develop strong feelings. You aren't Creighton, you aren't Wichita. 9 years is so much different than decades. I also don't get why you think we've embraced Valpo, there are probably hundreds of posts on this board about how awful the facilities are and the need for them to figure it out sooner rather than later.
We get that Loyola took the institutional fit, it is what it is but you're not going to a better league. You're going to a league that gets East Coast hype for being the same level. Just check out Hacksaws analysis. The Valley gets too few bids, gets way underseeded and then wins games. The A10 gets bids, gets overseeded and then loses games.