SalukiWorld wrote:Richmond is decent but can't lose by 30 to them
DUBulldog wrote:Bulldogs have not played well this season, despite the 8-1 record. It all came to a head today. Came out not ready to play, got in a huge hole and never made a run.
Next two opponents are both significantly better than Richmond. How will this Bulldog team respond?
SalukiWorld wrote:Richmond is decent but can't lose by 30 to them
ValleyFAN wrote:Missouri State loses at St Mary's 66-46 after being down just 5 at the half.
The Bears are not really capable of beating anyone with a pulse who is well coached. They have the talent to beat bad teams, so they'll probably hover around .500 and every once in awhile (like against MTSU) things will randomly come together for them and they'll blow out a solid team.
They play really hard on defense which helps, and have good athleticism and size, but I have no clue what they are trying to do on offense. It's boring, slow, and without any sort of plan. It reminds me actually a bit of some of Muller's Redbird teams which I never understood why they weren't better because they looked great coming out of the locker room. Ford's "system" worked when you had guys like Mosley and Prim who could get their own buckets at will, but this years group isnt built for that.
Seems like most Bears fans are about ready for Ford to move on, but thats not gonna happen this year. He's elevated the program for sure above where Lusk had it, but it's his deficiencies with X's and O's is really holding the program back.
Birdfan2018 wrote:ValleyFAN wrote:Missouri State loses at St Mary's 66-46 after being down just 5 at the half.
The Bears are not really capable of beating anyone with a pulse who is well coached. They have the talent to beat bad teams, so they'll probably hover around .500 and every once in awhile (like against MTSU) things will randomly come together for them and they'll blow out a solid team.
They play really hard on defense which helps, and have good athleticism and size, but I have no clue what they are trying to do on offense. It's boring, slow, and without any sort of plan. It reminds me actually a bit of some of Muller's Redbird teams which I never understood why they weren't better because they looked great coming out of the locker room. Ford's "system" worked when you had guys like Mosley and Prim who could get their own buckets at will, but this years group isnt built for that.
Seems like most Bears fans are about ready for Ford to move on, but thats not gonna happen this year. He's elevated the program for sure above where Lusk had it, but it's his deficiencies with X's and O's is really holding the program back.
Bears 65-61 home loss to PFW
SalukiWorld wrote:Birdfan2018 wrote:ValleyFAN wrote:Missouri State loses at St Mary's 66-46 after being down just 5 at the half.
The Bears are not really capable of beating anyone with a pulse who is well coached. They have the talent to beat bad teams, so they'll probably hover around .500 and every once in awhile (like against MTSU) things will randomly come together for them and they'll blow out a solid team.
They play really hard on defense which helps, and have good athleticism and size, but I have no clue what they are trying to do on offense. It's boring, slow, and without any sort of plan. It reminds me actually a bit of some of Muller's Redbird teams which I never understood why they weren't better because they looked great coming out of the locker room. Ford's "system" worked when you had guys like Mosley and Prim who could get their own buckets at will, but this years group isnt built for that.
Seems like most Bears fans are about ready for Ford to move on, but thats not gonna happen this year. He's elevated the program for sure above where Lusk had it, but it's his deficiencies with X's and O's is really holding the program back.
Bears 65-61 home loss to PFW
Fort Wayne isn't terrible but Missouri State obviously should win that game. Dana's seat should probably be getting hot. Them and SIU feel like parallels of each other. SIU might be at that point next year.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 127 guests