In looking at some early season MTE's certain trends continue that are very problematic for MM/LM teams. So far I've reviewed 24 tourneys; Ten [10] are exclusively P-5 , and 6 have only 1 non P-5 invitee. 8 are 4 P-5 team events. Of the 117 invitees to these tourneys 81[ 69%] are P-5 teams. A couple as we noted already are just groupings of MM/LM teams like the Myrtle Beach which has a nice field [WSU, Charleston, Furman, Vermont, Coastal Carolina, SLU, Wyoming, Liberty] but no P-5 .
The NCAA has moved to where the major qualifying factor for getting an at large is the number of Q1 games you play and win . With P-5 teams playing increased # of conference games, increased number of Inter league challenges, and now more exclusive MTE events, the opportunity for scheduling and playing those games is becoming bleak. Consider the last place team in the B12 , Texas Tech played 18 Q1 games last year going a pitiful 5-13, Drake played 3 going 1-2 . so the worst team in the B12 had 5x as many Q1 wins on 6x as many opportunities than our NCAA representative. And it's just getting tougher. A 16-16 team from a P-5 will always have a huge advantage in # of Q1 games over a 26-6 MM , and remember, they get to play over half their Q1 games either at home or neutral court, and even so -so teams win a majority of home games . I've said it before they came up with the perfect tool[ Q1 games] and have control over the qualifier[ scheduling] as to effectively eliminate at large MM/LM opportunities. This at a time when the evidence suggests a decreasing gap in talent levels across all levels of D-1 mbb.