ACECARD wrote:DoubleJayAlum wrote:Snaggletooth wrote:Wsu is not Evansville. Wsu may have lost experience, but there has been an upgrade in talent level.
I'm not touching the Evansville part, but the remainder of your quote seems to beg credibility just a bit. You lost all-conference caliber players in Ragland, Stutz and Murry. To say that the guys coming in will be more talented from day one would appear to be pretty optimistic to say the least; and, if true, would leave WSU with no excuses if it doesn't win the league title outright.
As to the poll in this thread, I am surprised it is this close.
Without a doubt. If WSU has better talent than last year, then we should be voting them first. I voted for WSU to finish fifth just because I think the Aces will finish higher than that, and apparently there are others who think the same.
I voted for WSU again and agree.