ACECARD wrote:Khan4Cats wrote:ACECARD wrote:According to a lot of people on this forum, losing one of your best players is not a valid reason for losing the game.
Against inferior competition, you are correct. Are you saying Colorado State should still win because Evansville is inferior?
You could probably stand a lesson in reading comprehension. I said other people have said it. I didn't say I said it.
Maybe you try the comprehension.
I responded to your post with a statement clarifying the statement that you made in your post. That was, that "According to a lot of people on this forum, losing one of your best players is not a valid reason for losing the game"-TO AN INFERIOR OPPONENT (which you left out). No one on this forum would have expected you to beat Notre Dame without Ryan. Buffalo, yes. See the difference?
I then asked you a question based on your statement.
So again, to the comprehension, are you saying that if CSU were to lose to you without one of their best players that it shouldn't have happened because Evansville is inferior to CSU?