valleychamp wrote:No, I never said that. I honestly don't know how you could read what I posted and then come up with all of that.
Every school and every program is different, and what works for one doesn't mean its going to work for the other.
What you said was ...
Other schools are going to continue doing things the way that they have, and WSU is going to continue doing things the way they have.
If what they have been doing isn't working, why would you continue to do things the same way?
I agree with your second point there. I'm certainly not arguing that I think we've discovered some magic formula everyone should imitate. I do, however, think that the system Oregon and Wichita State are currently using is working very well for both of those programs, and is likely an excellent bridge to build a high level of consistent success quickly before moving over into long-term players. It might not be for everyone, but it IS working, and it would be absurd for any coach in this conference, or in this country, to not look at a system that's working, figure out why it's working, and see what they can learn from it.
If you're not analyzing what works for others and modifying your system accordingly, you're not growing.
It's not just going "we're awesome copy us." When SIU had their amazing run, everyone should have looked at what they did and learned from it as well. Successful coaches develop systems that work. Adjusting aspects of that into your own system makes you a better coach. Marshall's four year stretch has been one of the best in MVC history ... to dismiss that as "WSU will keep doing what they've been doing and we'll keep doing what we're doing" seems rather small-minded. If that's the way we're looking at it, WSU will keep making NCAA tournaments and the other teams will continue missing them. Having consistent success is what we all want ... if one of the coaches has developed a method that seems to provide it, why wouldn't all programs see if they could use it as well?