frankthetank wrote:There are two important keys to conference realignment: "It takes two to tango" and "Remember who has the leverage."
In this case, what Bradley wants (or Wichita State wants or Indiana State wants or anyone else in the MVC wants) is largely irrelevant. None of them have any real leverage in this scenario. In this situation, the A-10 has all of the leverage. If they want Bradley, I think they could actually poach them fairly easily from the MVC whether or not SLU and Dayton stay. Even without SLU and Dayton, the A-10 is definitely higher on the conference realignment pecking order than the MVC and Bradley isn't so far outside of the footprint that they wouldn't be nixed as a candidate based on geography alone. However, there's little indication that they would want Bradley at this point. The interesting thing is that Loyola (who the MVC just added) is probably the school that fits what the A-10 would want the best (a large private school in a massive market) if it wanted to go further into the Midwest. That league simply hasn't indicated that it wants to do that, though (as they likely know it's a matter of time that SLU, at the very least, will be a Big East member sooner rather than later).
frankthetank wrote:There are two important keys to conference realignment: "It takes two to tango" and "Remember who has the leverage."
In this case, what Bradley wants (or Wichita State wants or Indiana State wants or anyone else in the MVC wants) is largely irrelevant. None of them have any real leverage in this scenario. In this situation, the A-10 has all of the leverage. If they want Bradley, I think they could actually poach them fairly easily from the MVC whether or not SLU and Dayton stay. Even without SLU and Dayton, the A-10 is definitely higher on the conference realignment pecking order than the MVC and Bradley isn't so far outside of the footprint that they wouldn't be nixed as a candidate based on geography alone. However, there's little indication that they would want Bradley at this point. The interesting thing is that Loyola (who the MVC just added) is probably the school that fits what the A-10 would want the best (a large private school in a massive market) if it wanted to go further into the Midwest. That league simply hasn't indicated that it wants to do that, though (as they likely know it's a matter of time that SLU, at the very least, will be a Big East member sooner rather than later).
uniftw wrote:UCONN is only there until they get the call from the ACC, Big 10, or drop football to FCS/completely and rejoin the Big East. Cinci is just waiting for the ACC/B1G/B12 to call their name as well.
TheAsianSensation wrote:If there was a way you could physically bolt St Louis and Dayton to the conference, then sure. But that ain't happening anytime soon. Not worth risking being on an island in that conference.
On the other hand, if we could get Bradley, Wichita St, Drake, and maybe Detroit to be part of a western group with St Louis and Dayton, and maybe even if St Louis leaves that's still palatable if you add Valpo......probably too many moving pieces anyways. Nope.
rlh04d wrote:or a Florida State that somehow gets AAU status soon
DoubleJayAlum wrote:rlh04d wrote:or a Florida State that somehow gets AAU status soon
I can't decide if this is intentionally funny or unintentionally funny. FSU getting AAU status is certainly high comedy though, whether intentional or unintentional.
frankthetank wrote: Even without SLU and Dayton, the A-10 is definitely higher on the conference realignment pecking order than the MVC
Sycamore_DevilDog wrote:My niece plays softball for Dayton and they have been told Dayton along with St. Louis will be joining the "New" Big East next year. If so, who replaces these two schools in the A-10?
rlh04d wrote:Missed one thing the first time I replied to this ... no chance in hell Cinci goes to the B1G. Ever. They don't need another school in Ohio, let alone an inferior one. And they're in a weird spot where they seem to be a decent research institute, and thus might get AAU status one day, but their overall academics are poor.
UConn has a better shot, but I think the B1G is more likely to move south for further realignment. I'd imagine their long term goal would include schools like Virginia, UNC or Duke, Georgia Tech, or a Florida State that somehow gets AAU status soon -- all of those are better programs with better markets.
Those states are also 4 (FL), 8 (GA), 10 (UNC), and 12 (VA) in total population, compared to Connecticut at 29. If they were able to get those four states, they'd have a presence in every state in the top 12 but Texas and California.
I don't see Cinci or UConn going anywhere until realignment explodes again. They'd be fill ins as a reaction to realignment rather than driving it themselves. I think the NC and Virginia schools are the same ones the SEC would want, and I don't know what in the hell the B12 wants to do. Eventually the ACC will get shredded and those two will plug in the holes.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: SalukiWorld and 22 guests