ISU losing to UNLV = bad; Bradley losing to EIU = good

by **Bradleyfans Fan** » December 2nd, 2010, 1:26 pm

http://bradleyfans.com/vb/showthread.php?t=16978

Wow!

I can't believe the PJ Star is so cruel to Jimmy and the boys.

**Sponsor**

by **xsaluki** » December 2nd, 2010, 9:58 pm

Weird. I think that the local SI papers aren't direct enough in covering some of our bad loses. In Peoria there are people that want a sugar coating to bad loses.

by **braves12** » December 3rd, 2010, 9:47 am

Some bradleyfans would prefer the local newspaper be like a state run newspaper. It is funny that some think the problems are everywhere except within the program.

by **MSUDuo** » December 4th, 2010, 12:16 am

ISUr losing to UNLV by 31 = bad

Bradley losing to EIU = bad

Both need to turn it around to help the conference

by **45otseoj** » December 4th, 2010, 4:04 am

MSU still losing important road games = bad

by **MSUDuo** » December 4th, 2010, 11:06 am

45otseoj wrote:MSU still losing important road games = bad

Yeah, find one person would would consider losing on the road to Tennessee and Tulsa bad...Good try though...

by **45otseoj** » December 4th, 2010, 11:32 am

MSUDuo wrote:
45otseoj wrote:MSU still losing important road games = bad

Yeah, find one person would would consider losing on the road to Tennessee and Tulsa bad...Good try though...

Bad for your re'sume'...

by **MSUDuo** » December 4th, 2010, 2:09 pm

Agree to disagree.

by **45otseoj** » December 5th, 2010, 1:48 pm

MSUDuo wrote:Agree to disagree.

You're disagreeing that key road losses are bad for your at-large re'sume'?

by **Jet915** » December 5th, 2010, 1:56 pm

Unless someone runs through the Valley schedule w/2 or less losses, no one has an "at-large" resume anymore.