Looking at the post season success of the Big East schools got me thinking about the MVC. Who has a final 4 or better?
WSU has 2.
Loyola has a National Championship
ISUb has a runner-up
Bradley has how many?
Drake?
Anyone else?
MSUDuo wrote:I guess I really don't care what he does. Seems to be the norm around here now. Just found it comical that he suggests that CU is obsessed with WSU all the while he's responding left and right them.
Back to the topic at hand, we can't say whether the Big East is major or not this year. They certainly have teams/schools with firepower. Georgetown and Villanova have titles. We know about Butler, Xavier, and Marquette and their runs of recent success. Only CU and Marquette don't have a Final Four among the Big East teams.
Could they very well fall behind without the football money coming in? Sure. But only time will tell.
I expect Georgetown, Villanova, Butler, Xavier, CU, and Marquette to continue their success and separate themselves from the rest
Valley_Fan wrote:The Big East is a Major because the collective RPI will make it one. 9 of the 10 teams will finish in the top 100, which will mean it will trail only the big 10 and acc.
This is why the mvc needs to get back to its scheduling mandate. Spend two or three years taking the one-and-dones and getting 9 or 10 schools in top 150, much less the top 100 will allow the mvc to make progress. That is the only way it improves it's media deals.
shoxrox wrote:Valley_Fan wrote:The Big East is a Major because the collective RPI will make it one. 9 of the 10 teams will finish in the top 100, which will mean it will trail only the big 10 and acc.
This is why the mvc needs to get back to its scheduling mandate. Spend two or three years taking the one-and-dones and getting 9 or 10 schools in top 150, much less the top 100 will allow the mvc to make progress. That is the only way it improves it's media deals.
They. Are. Still. Here.
The Valley's collective RPI had been Top 6 consistently for several years. Guess we were major too. Mountain West is by far a major then. Using arbitrary numbers to try and make point is stupid. And how the hell do you know that 9 of 10 teams will finish in the Top 100 RPI?
You're really grasping, which is what straggling CU fans have been doing here since they supposedly "left". Hard to tell that they "left".
shoxrox wrote:How exactly is it major? Because it's still called the "Big East"? Because it got a tv contract made through a fringe network that nobody watches and isn't even on anybody's radar? Because they're private institutions?
Georgetown and Marquette are major programs that carry a lot of weight, but that's about it. Marquette is the only one recently that really has contributed anything meaningful in the NCAA's. Butler is there, but they're falling fast I think.
They are a decent league but not a major one. They've lost too much and didn't acquire nearly enough to compensate the losses.
Sorry.
Valley_Fan wrote:The Big East is a Major because the collective RPI will make it one. 9 of the 10 teams will finish in the top 100, which will mean it will trail only the big 10 and acc.
shoxrox wrote:Sorry, I could care less about the Big East and probably most here feel the same way.
ihsi wrote:shoxrox wrote:Sorry, I could care less about the Big East and probably most here feel the same way.
Your constant posting about the Big East and your signature would indicate otherwise.
TheAsianSensation wrote:People think the floor of the Big East are a bunch of bad RPI 250 teams. The real floor is more like 150.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Bulldog2323 and 12 guests