uniftw wrote:Putting more butts in the seats with the "talent" that UE has isn't going to win them more games....
Not his year, no. But butts in the seat are what generates money. Money pays for facility upgrades, coaching salaries, etc.
I'm sure any claim that fan apathy results in poor long term performance will be unpopular here, since most MVC programs have poor attendance. But there is a reason WSU is far outpacing every program in the Valley in most factors that matter. They won't always have the best team year to year, but WSU will be by far the most valuable and strongest program long term. And it's because of fan support.
A couple good players or a great coaching hire can give you a few years of success. Butts in the seat are the only chance of long term success, though. Especially in this conference where you can't artificially create a program using TV revenue.
Wichita State is the only program in this conference that can afford to keep a coach that is good enough to be wanted in bigger conferences. When you can only hire coaches that aren't good enough to "move up," how much can you really expect from them? And even among MVC programs, Evansville is laughable -- Marty Simmons still has the smallest contract among MVC coaches, right? Last I saw Simmons was making $180k a year -- that's a joke in coaching salaries. Most decent assistant coaches make more than that. So Evansville fills less than half their arena and pays their HC peanuts, but yet it's the coach's fault that they aren't winning? Success is all relative. When you have the smallest HC salary in the conference, and the second smallest average home attendance (before Loyola joined), and you aren't finishing on Thursday night every year -- that's success. Simmons is succeeding beyond the resources and support he's getting.
Trying to look at problems in a short term context and ignoring the long term context is a fools errand. You'll just repeat mistakes.