by Wufan » January 12th, 2014, 10:24 am
I've read a few comments about how MSU was milking clock in the last 10 minutes (and they were) and that Lusk made poor adjustments (and he may have), but having watched the Shockers under the Marshall era (and Turgeon era) it takes a lot of winning to learn how to maintain or extend a lead. It wasn't until after the NIT championship that WSU demonstrated a fairly consistent ability to keep their foot on the gas. Also, in Marshall's post-game comments he stated two key adjustments he made down the stretch:
1) On offense, MSU was switching on the ball screen. Marshall had the center set ball screens for VanVleet knowing that Fred, at the top of the key, would have a big advantage getting to the rim with PF or C on him. Fred scored 11 points in the last 7 minutes of the game.
2) On defense, Marshall had the players extend the man-to-man and take away the outside shot. The risk here is that it's easier for MSU to drive and more likely that MSU would draw fouls. I think this is where the toughness of the Shockers really shined. With the "in your grill" style of defense, MSU was unable to penetrate and the crisp passes stopped. Lots of fade-away and hurried jumpers as time wound down.
Credit Marshall for the game plan and credit the players for executing and demonstrating the character necessary to accomplish that come back.
Again, mucho credit to the Bears. They really did expose the Shockers for about 25 minutes of the game and it's unfortunate that one of those two teams had to lose such an exceptional game.