DUShock wrote:bleach wrote:DUShock wrote:I said it then and I continue to believe it now, MSU set the program back a decade when they fired Barry.
Go Valley!
Go Shocks!
Then you would have been wrong then and are now.
The Bears have won ONE regular season championship. When did that happen? The program is now stocking up some real nice young talent to build a long term program from. You may think we were there with Barry but when he left we were getting pretty bad.
Alford 1995-1999 4 seasons 78-48 62%
Hinson 1999-2008 9 seasons 169-117 69%
Martin 2008-2011 3 seasons 61-41 67%
Lusk 2011-2012 2 seasons (excludes 2013-14) 27-38 -41% (that's minus forty one percent)
Alford's 4 seasons vs Hinson's Last 4 winning percentages:
95-96 57% 04-05 59%
96-97 73% 05-06 71%
97-98 50% 06-07 67%
98-99 67% (lost ncaa regional final) 07-08 52%
Alford's career winning percentage 62% vs Hinson's last 4 is 61%
Just my take.
If you remove the first year of each coach which has little to do with that coach, things look much different. Barry followed a Sweet 16 with 4 starters returning and had his best year but it should not be a plus for him. That team greatly underachieved. Zo followed a Barry team that was horrid (The place Barry had gotten to) and struggled but built it back up fast. Lusk gets no credit for this year? It's the first year his recruits have any experience. Lusk also took over a team that lost a lot of its recruits to Tennessee and had little chance to recruit anything long term.